"G. Adam Stanislav" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, Dec 05, 2000 at 06:11:06PM +0100, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
> >The second and third sentences of the second paragraph (the one that
> >starts on line 23), as well as the entire eighth paragraph (that
> >starts on line 45), address the ques
On Wednesday, 6th December 2000, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
>"G. Adam Stanislav" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> I know it addresses it. Unfortunately, I didn't understand a word of it.
> MAP_ANONMap anonymous memory not associated with any specific file.
> The file descri
> :The mlock man page refers to some system limit on wired pages; I get no
> :error when mlock()'ing the hash file, and I'm reasonably sure I tweaked
> :the INN source to treat both files identically (and on the other machines
> :I have running, the timestamps of both files remains pretty much unc
Hi,
the ATM stuff in /sys/dev/h{e,f}a and /sys/netatm seems to be seriously
broken in current. A simple 'atm show config' command leads to a kernel
panic. I have tracked down the problem (and had to learn, that bzero is a
function pointer rather than a function on i386).
I cannot track, how the
I would like to thank everyone who has answered my recent question
about memory allocation via mmap. I received many message via private
e-mail in addition to those here.
One of them sent me to an online sample chapter of one of Stevens' book
(Interprocess Communication) which explains mmap. That
Hello,
I'm encountering a problem with the stardard libc malloc/free library.
if a program allocates a huge (and temporary) amount of memory with
small structures then free it, the library gives back only a few pages
to the system.
>From the /usr/src/lib/libc/stdlib/malloc.c sources, it seems th
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Remy Nonnenmacher wr
ites:
>>From the /usr/src/lib/libc/stdlib/malloc.c sources, it seems that this
>is due to not shrinking/relocating pagedir pages (free_pages(), comment
>around line 940). This means that returning pages stop at first
>allocated pagedir.
That i
I tried remote debugging on FreeBSD 4.2 this morning. Everything was
fine, except that I saw the following messages:
(gdb) step
ptrace(PT_GETDBREGS) failed: No such process
ptrace(PT_GETDBREGS) failed: No such process
ptrace(PT_GETDBREGS) failed: No such process
201 cred = p ? p->p_
OK. In fact my problem was just a printf that allocated a buffer via
__smakebuf at the very last moment (when all memory was allocated).
This prevent free() to give back all previous pages up to this one. The
problem was _not_ in malloc.c.
Anyway, i learned a lot from hacking the source to catch
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Remy Nonnenmacher wr
ites:
>OK. In fact my problem was just a printf that allocated a buffer via
>__smakebuf at the very last moment (when all memory was allocated).
>This prevent free() to give back all previous pages up to this one. The
>problem was _not_ in mallo
Excellent.
What I believe is going on is that without the madvise()/mlock() the
general accesses to the 1 GB main history file are causing the pages to be
flushed from the .hash and .index files too quickly. The performance
problems in general appear to be due to the system
Does anyone know of patches or something to support these cards? The cards
that I have is by Syba Tech and is a 4 x serial and 2 x parallel port pci
card. It has 2 winbond W83877TF 2 x serial + 1 x parallel port "superio"
chips and some pci glue. The card has 0x400 bytes of io space, as big as
the
:
:OK. In fact my problem was just a printf that allocated a buffer via
:__smakebuf at the very last moment (when all memory was allocated).
:This prevent free() to give back all previous pages up to this one. The
:problem was _not_ in malloc.c.
:
:Anyway, i learned a lot from hacking the source t
"G. Adam Stanislav" wrote:
>
> On Mon, Dec 04, 2000 at 12:56:51PM +1000, Stephen McKay wrote:
> >Using pipes for temporary storage is still a crazy idea. Pipes can be
> >smaller than 8K, depending on the flavour of Unix.
>
> It was just a thought, and it did not work. :) Other flavors of Unix
>
I have a question about FreeBSD...is it possible to set acl's on commands?
(eg..giving one specific user the abiltity to execute a command w/o putting
them in a group) I'm talking about something like this:
http://www.sunworld.com/swol-06-1998/swol-06-insidesolaris.html. Can we do
something like
Don't know if I should post here but
I just installed 4.2-RELEASE onto a ppro 200 (had linux) the install
went without a hich. Then when I rebooted, the box just stopped. It
seemed like it could not read the mbr. So I booted again off the
floppies and I used the loader to switched the currde
Hi, I have been writing a PAM module to do Kerberos 5 and AFS stuff, and
have run across a couple of problems.
First of all, the simple one. :) How do you set or modify an
environment
variable? Neither setenv, pam_misc_setenv, or pam_putenv seem to be
work.
>From what I gather from the pam_ssh m
On Wed, Dec 06, 2000 at 01:04:36PM -0500, Zhiui Zhang wrote:
> I tried remote debugging on FreeBSD 4.2 this morning. Everything was
> fine, except that I saw the following messages:
>
> (gdb) step
> ptrace(PT_GETDBREGS) failed: No such process
> ptrace(PT_GETDBREGS) failed: No such process
> pt
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> John Hay writes:
: Does anyone know of patches or something to support these cards? The cards
: that I have is by Syba Tech and is a 4 x serial and 2 x parallel port pci
: card. It has 2 winbond W83877TF 2 x serial + 1 x parallel port "superio"
: chips and some pci g
I had the same problem on an old PPro box. The BIOS seemingly doesn't
like the new (2 sector long) boot manager. If you fire up sysinstall
again, and tell it to install the "standard bootblocks" (forgot the
exact phrase), rather than the boot manager, you'll probably be OK.
louie
> Don't know
On Thu, Dec 07, 2000 at 12:06:46AM +, Chris wrote:
> Hi, I have been writing a PAM module to do Kerberos 5 and AFS stuff, and
> have run across a couple of problems.
Have you looked at ports/security/pam_krb5, by the way? This does
Kerberos 5, but not AFS.
> The next is pam_setcred(). I've
I think what you're looking for is something similar (or exactly
like) 'sudo'..
You can get it under your ports tree:
/usr/ports/security/sudo/
Or on-line:
www.freebsd.org/ports/security.html
RSN
On Wed, 6 Dec 2000, Michael Chong wrote:
> I have a question about FreeBSD...is it possible to
What parameters should I choose for a large (say, 60 or 80Gb)
filesystem? I remember a while ago someone (phk?) conducted a survey,
but nothing seems to have come of it. In the meantime, the capacity of
an average hard drive has increased tenfold, and the defaults have
become even less reasonab
As people may have noticed, I've been working on a cleanup of parts of
our PCI subsystem. The next round of changes are ready for review.
In summary, the changes:
- Break out our bridge support into separate PCI:PCI, PCI:EISA and
PCI:ISA modules.
- Move all PCI core code into sys/dev/pc
That's because any "consensus" would be inappropriate for mass consumtion.
It really depends on a lot of fun things like the average file size and the
number of files that the drives will be storing. For example, a mail server
might want more inodes than a database server. The mail server will lik
Folks,
I need to use Router Alert (rfc2113)
(http://www.phys-iasi.ro/Library/RFCs/rfc2113.htm)
* Is there any documentation for using Router Alert in the FreeBSD
environement.
* Are there specific options that the Kernel must be compiled with?
* I know in Linux there is a IP_ROUTER_ALE
"Louis A. Mamakos" wrote:
> I had the same problem on an old PPro box. The BIOS seemingly doesn't
> like the new (2 sector long) boot manager. If you fire up sysinstall
> again, and tell it to install the "standard bootblocks" (forgot the
> exact phrase), rather than the boot manager, you'll pr
>
>I think what you're looking for is something similar (or exactly
>like) 'sudo'..
sudo definitely helps if it's carefully administered, but it still
grants root access to a file, which may not really be what you want.
As a Unix advocate in general, I'm looking forward to seeing how well
Sun doe
David Talkington wrote:
> sudo definitely helps if it's carefully administered, but it still
> grants root access to a file,
This is wrong -- sudo will grant access with whatever user
privileges you wish to grant, maybe root and maybe some other
user. It all depends on the way you set it up.
I
:That's because any "consensus" would be inappropriate for mass consumtion.
:It really depends on a lot of fun things like the average file size and the
:number of files that the drives will be storing. For example, a mail server
:might want more inodes than a database server. The mail server will
Alwyn Goodloe wrote:
> I need to use Router Alert (rfc2113)
> (http://www.phys-iasi.ro/Library/RFCs/rfc2113.htm)
>
> * Is there any documentation for using Router Alert in the FreeBSD
> environement.
> * Are there specific options that the Kernel must be compiled with?
> * I know in Linux th
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>David Talkington wrote:
>
>> sudo definitely helps if it's carefully administered, but it still
>> grants root access to a file,
>
>This is wrong -- sudo will grant access with whatever user
>privileges you wish to grant, maybe root and ma
Greg Black wrote:
>> sudo definitely helps if it's carefully administered, but it still
>> grants root access to a file,
>
>This is wrong -- sudo will grant access with whatever user
>privileges you wish to grant, maybe root and maybe some other
>user. It all depends on the way you set it up.
W
>On Thu, Dec 07, 2000 at 12:06:46AM +, Chris wrote:
>> Hi, I have been writing a PAM module to do Kerberos 5 and AFS stuff, and
>> have run across a couple of problems.
>
>Have you looked at ports/security/pam_krb5, by the way? This does
>Kerberos 5, but not AFS.
IIRC, this module will auth
> Ah ha! I think I found the culprit, but I'm not sure exactly where
> in the tftp code the problem is occuring.
>
> I have been setting LOADER_TFTP_SUPPORT in /etc/make.conf so my pxeboot
> file uses tftp to get the kernel rather then NFS (since NFS appears to
> only be able
Ah ha! I think I found the culprit, but I'm not sure exactly where
in the tftp code the problem is occuring.
I have been setting LOADER_TFTP_SUPPORT in /etc/make.conf so my pxeboot
file uses tftp to get the kernel rather then NFS (since NFS appears to
only be able to get [roo
36 matches
Mail list logo
