I wish to forward broadcast packets from one subnet to another via a FreeBSD
box.
Both subnets are on the same Ethernet interface. Is this possible?
Chris
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
> I have been having a great time :-) debugging a device driver,
> and have run into a really fun way to panic. With one type
> of traffic, [something] happens and the kernel drops into
> DDB, just the way I want.
8)
> Well, actually DDB seems to get trapped in some kind of loop
> that spews m
Hello,
How can i port all content of my server to new one ?
On a new server i have new hdd...
I want to port kernel,all packages installed and so so so...
What is a correct answer for this?
Unix-administrator
mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] < /etc/master.passwd
-BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK
All right, feel free to flame me a LOT for what follows :)
There are situations (at least I could think of some :) where it is necessary
to change a running process's credentials. I'm thinking specifically of the
effective UID and GID, but I might have to tinker with the real and saved
UID's, to
> I wish to forward broadcast packets from one subnet to another via a FreeBSD
> box.
> Both subnets are on the same Ethernet interface. Is this possible?
You should not do this in a routed environment, but is required in a
bidged enviroment. the kernel bridge(4) support should allow you to
Paonia Ezrine wrote:
>> The system calls are described in section 2 of the manual.
>
> thanks. do you mean handbook?
No, he means the manual. "man 2 intro" to get an introduction, "man 2
read" for a particular system call, etc.
--
Ben Smithurst / [EMAIL PROTECTED] / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsu
* Peter Pentchev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [001115 06:19] wrote:
> All right, feel free to flame me a LOT for what follows :)
No need for that. (yet) :-)
> There are situations (at least I could think of some :) where it is necessary
> to change a running process's credentials. I'm thinking specifica
On Wed, Nov 15, 2000 at 08:47:22AM -0800, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
> * Peter Pentchev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [001115 06:19] wrote:
> > All right, feel free to flame me a LOT for what follows :)
>
> No need for that. (yet) :-)
..possibly because I did not make my intentions clear enough :)
> > There
* Peter Pentchev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [001115 09:02] wrote:
> >
> > Well there's setuid for you.
>
> Hmm.. I've also received two private mails so far, pointing me to setuid().
> The problem is, I want to force a new UID on *another* process without
> its knowledge. setuid() only works on the p
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Peter Pentchev writes:
: There are situations (at least I could think of some :) where it is necessary
: to change a running process's credentials. I'm thinking specifically of the
: effective UID and GID, but I might have to tinker with the real and saved
: UID's,
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Peter Pentchev writes:
: Hmm.. I've also received two private mails so far, pointing me to setuid().
: The problem is, I want to force a new UID on *another* process without
: its knowledge. setuid() only works on the process invoking it, so
: both the 'force' and
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Alfred Perlstein writes:
: Unless this syscall was restricted to root, or a small subset of
: uid's it would cause some severe security issues from my point
: of view.
Even the small subset of uids would be highly suspect.
Warner
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMA
* Warner Losh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [001115 09:16] wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Alfred Perlstein writes:
> : Unless this syscall was restricted to root, or a small subset of
> : uid's it would cause some severe security issues from my point
> : of view.
>
> Even the small subset of uids
> > > Thank you! This gets the me disk %busy, which is one of the things I
> > > was looking for. Now, can anyone tell me how to tell what percentage of
> > > processor time is being spent waiting for disk I/O to complete?
> >
> > Uh, none?
> >
> > If there is disk I/O pending, the processor j
On Wed, 15 Nov 2000, Terry Lambert wrote:
> > > > Thank you! This gets the me disk %busy, which is one of the things I
> > > > was looking for. Now, can anyone tell me how to tell what percentage of
> > > > processor time is being spent waiting for disk I/O to complete?
> > >
> > > Uh, none?
>
On Wed, 15 Nov 2000, Terry Lambert wrote:
>
> I'm always tempted to set up a company where the main
> engineers have a centralized batch compile server, so as to
> not slow down developement, but requiring that they run no
> better than a 386SX/16 on their desktop. If they are good,
> I'd gi
Maybe I'm just being boneheaded, but...
> ! sudo ipfw add 4 divert 12345 all from any to any via INTERFACE
> ! sudo /usr/local/bin/tcpmssd -p 12345 -i INTERFACE
I was under the (tested & confirmed) impression that programs executed by
ppp are run under uid 0. Eg. I don't use "sudo" but t
On Wed, Nov 15, 2000 at 04:02:28PM +0300, hellman wrote:
> Hello,
>
> How can i port all content of my server to new one ?
>
> On a new server i have new hdd...
>
> I want to port kernel,all packages installed and so so so...
>
> What is a correct answer for this?
tar and netcat or a NFS moun
Hello,
It seems that some Linux distribs are on trouble with icmp replies that
get replied (see below). My question is: is there any known issue on
FreeBSD getting an icmp reply and responding by another icmp reply ?
(Guess not but better be sure).
Exemple:
00:10:37.305915 33.85.11.rrcentralflo
> Maybe I'm just being boneheaded, but...
>
> > ! sudo ipfw add 4 divert 12345 all from any to any via INTERFACE
> > ! sudo /usr/local/bin/tcpmssd -p 12345 -i INTERFACE
>
> I was under the (tested & confirmed) impression that programs executed by
> ppp are run under uid 0. Eg. I don't us
> ppp will run programs as the user id that invoked ppp rather than
> using the effective user id (ie, it runs things as *you*, not *root*).
Mmm-mmh. In my case, since ppp is started at boot time, the only user that
ever invokes it is root, hence the tcpmssd thingy is run as root. As
confirmed by
I heard rumor that Thomas E. Anderson's Scheduler Activations theory will
be implemented in FreeBSD 5.0 kernel, is it true?
Regards,
XuYifeng
_
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.
Share
* frank xu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [001115 23:15] wrote:
> I heard rumor that Thomas E. Anderson's Scheduler Activations theory will
> be implemented in FreeBSD 5.0 kernel, is it true?
Several people have begun the initial development on it.
--
-Alfred Perlstein - [[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTE
Are you sure that your system isn't hacked/cracked ?
Content of packets look strange for me.
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> Hello,
> It seems that some Linux distribs are on trouble with icmp replies that
> get replied (see below). My question is: is there any known issue on
> FreeB
On Thu, 16 Nov 2000, Eugene Polovnikov wrote:
> Are you sure that your system isn't hacked/cracked ?
> Content of packets look strange for me.
Yeah, now that you suggested that, I checked - that's Stacheldraht's
handiwork.
Unplug the box soon, Remy!
Mike "Silby" Silbersack
To Unsubscribe:
25 matches
Mail list logo
