On Thu, 7 Sep 2000, Peter Wemm wrote:
> Mike Silbersack wrote:
> > Ok, now I have a question. Using STARTTLS with sendmail is obviously OK
> > for us, since sendmail got the export liscense. However, AFAIK, qmail and
> > postfix have obtained no such permission.
>
> Postfix has done the BXA h
Is it possible from kernel mode to create a list of newbus devices ? And how do I'll
get a pointer to the new-bus root (or whatever it's tecnical name is :)
---
Nicolai Petri
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
>From the README:
ATA-tagged-queueing-diff-0908:
Add support for ATA channels with both a master and a slave, even
combos where only on of them supports tagged queuing should work now.
Also only switch on tagged queuing on IBM DPTA & DTLA series
drives, the older DJNA has firmware prob
The answers are 'no' and 'root_bus'.
The 'no' could be revised into something more useful if you are able to
tell us what you are trying to do.
Nick
On Fri, 8 Sep 2000, Nicolai Petri wrote:
> Is it possible from kernel mode to create a list of newbus devices ?
> And how do I'll get a pointer
Hi,
are there any plans to implement makecontext() & friends
functions in FreeBSD?
Is there any other way to implement user-level threads?
(I know it can be done in assembler, but this is not
portable)
Using pthreads is not an option for me, although pthreads
are implemented as userlevel thre
Hi,
are there any plans to implement makecontext() & friends
functions in FreeBSD?
Is there any other way to implement user-level threads?
(I know it can be done in assembler, but this is not
portable)
Using pthreads is not an option for me, although pthreads
are implemented as userlevel thre
Lance Rocker wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I too had problems with running out of shared mem segments, so I wrote
> my first ever perl script that does something useful for me. I've
> attached it to this email and I'll paste it in below too, for
> convenience.
>
> I noticed that many (most?) of the shar
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> are there any plans to implement makecontext() & friends
> functions in FreeBSD?
I don't know of any plans myself, but I would appreciate that we support this
standardized ucontext(3) API in FreeBSD. The API is actually not the problem,
the question
Just noticed this little oddity while building XFree86-4, from ports
supped today:
make -k -f xmakefile all
root 17383 0.0 0.2 628 244 p6 I+6:30AM 0:00.00 (sh)
root 36617 0.0 0.5 1076 680 p6 I+6:51AM 0:00.05 make -k -k
CDEBUGFLAGS= all
root 36618 0.0 0.2 628
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Nicolai Petri writes:
: Is it possible from kernel mode to create a list of newbus devices ?
: And how do I'll get a pointer to the new-bus root (or whatever it's
: tecnical name is :)
Yes. You keep asking for parents until you get none. The one that
has a null pa
On Fri, 8 Sep 2000, Mitja Horvat wrote:
> Hi,
>
> are there any plans to implement makecontext() & friends
> functions in FreeBSD?
>
> Is there any other way to implement user-level threads?
> (I know it can be done in assembler, but this is not
> portable)
>
> Using pthreads is not an optio
At 6:27 PM -0400 9/7/00, John Doh! wrote:
>Hello to you am I C coder who to wish write programs we cannot
>exploit via code such as below.
>
>>
>> main(int argc, char **argv)
>> {
>> if(argc > 1) {
>> printf(gettext("usage: %s filename\n"),argv[0]);
>> exit(0);
>> }
>> printf("normal
On Fri, 8 Sep 2000, Ralf S. Engelschall wrote:
>
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
>
> > are there any plans to implement makecontext() & friends
> > functions in FreeBSD?
>
> I don't know of any plans myself, but I would appreciate that we support this
> standardized ucontext(3) API
Soren Schmidt wrote:
>
> >From the README:
>
> ATA-tagged-queueing-diff-0908:
> Add support for ATA channels with both a master and a slave, even
> combos where only on of them supports tagged queuing should work now.
> Also only switch on tagged queuing on IBM DPTA & DTLA series
> drive
It seems Thierry Herbelot wrote:
> Soren Schmidt wrote:
> >
> > >From the README:
> >
> > ATA-tagged-queueing-diff-0908:
> > Add support for ATA channels with both a master and a slave, even
> > combos where only on of them supports tagged queuing should work now.
> > Also only switch on t
>
> Yeah :)
>
> > Any chance an older IBM drive might be supported ?
> >
>
> Well, the DTTA's say they support tagged queuing, but since the
> newer DJNA has firmware problems the DTTA probably has that
> too. To be fair I havn't tried it yet, so if you feel adventurous
> you can try to add it
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Matthew
Jacob writes:
>>
>> Yeah :)
>>
>> > Any chance an older IBM drive might be supported ?
>> >
>>
>> Well, the DTTA's say they support tagged queuing, but since the
>> newer DJNA has firmware problems the DTTA probably has that
>> too. To be fair I havn't
Thank you for your last reply about the Promise 100 controller, I got it
working with that patch.
But now, I have Asus P2L97 mobo with 64MB RAM, 266MHz P2 and 4 Maxtor
54098H8's, two per channel. OS is FreeBSD 4.1-STABLE.
When I use vinum with the following config:
drive drive0 device /dev/ad0
> Hello to you am I C coder who to wish write programs we cannot exploit via
> code such as below.
>
> >
> > main(int argc, char **argv)
> > {
> > if(argc > 1) {
> > printf(gettext("usage: %s filename\n"),argv[0]);
> > exit(0);
> >}
> >printf("normal execution proceed
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "John Doh!" writes:
> : Issue is must be getting format string from "untrusted" place, but want to
> : limit substitution of %... to the substitution of say in example the
> : argv[0], but to not do others so that say given "usage: %s filename %p" %p
> : not int
> Hello,
> What about md5 in the boot loader. I've included a patch to
> src/sys/boot/ficl/words.c No doubt with lots of little errors. I
> added this after concerns while working on PXE booting.
> I'm looking for a sense of direction... Is using MD5 better
> than just a clear text
> Is it possible from kernel mode to create a list of newbus devices ? And
> how do I'll get a pointer to the new-bus root (or whatever it's tecnical
> name is :)
extern devclass_t nexus_devclass;
nexus = devclass_get_device(nexus_devclass, 0);
static void
device_enumerate_children(de
At 22:24 +0300 2000.09.08, Esko Petteri Matinsola wrote:
>
>read performance and seeks seems OK, but block writes only about 1/9th !
>As I read from www.vinumvm.org I should get something like 5MBps block
>writes.
>
>Have I misunderstood something, configured someting improperly, it's
>because of
On Fri, Sep 08, 2000 at 02:56:10PM +0100, John Toon wrote:
>
> However, it seems strange that you're getting non-attached memory
> segments. Surely it is the job of the kernel to clean up after processes
> (if they're badly programmed and don't do it themselves)? Perhaps one
> program is leaking?
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> On Fri, 8 Sep 2000, Ralf S. Engelschall wrote:
>>
>> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
>>
>> > are there any plans to implement makecontext() & friends
>> > functions in FreeBSD?
>>
>> I don't know of any plans myself, but I would appreciate
On Friday, 8 September 2000 at 22:24:51 +0300, Esko Petteri Matinsola wrote:
> Thank you for your last reply about the Promise 100 controller, I got it
> working with that patch.
>
> But now, I have Asus P2L97 mobo with 64MB RAM, 266MHz P2 and 4 Maxtor
> 54098H8's, two per channel. OS is FreeBSD
Note* rawio will overwrite your data, so be careful!
Here are tests that I ran using a 4 disk array (10k RPM SCSI disks). I have
about 20 datafiles comprising 8 different stripe sizes for 3 different raid
configurations (0,5,1+0) if anyone is interested (Greg?).
Thanks,
brandon
> -Origin
27 matches
Mail list logo
