On Sunday, July 16, 2000, Coleman Kane wrote:
> This is a great idea. We need a good, well drawn out description of
> what DEVFS is supposed to accomplish and how we'd like it to work. I
> will be glad to help out, and perhaps we can get some movement on this.
> Personally, I'd like to see DEVFS c
Marc,
Do you know anyone who has tried the support of AIC-7899 chips? That
chipset is used on some quad and dual XEON boards.
-john v.e.
On Sun, 16 Jul 2000, Marc Veldman wrote:
> On Tue, 11 Jul 2000, Kenneth D. Merry wrote:
>
> > > Is Adaptec aic-7892 and 7899 160/m SCSI support in the pipel
Could somebody give me suggestion? I believe many people know about this
question. But I did not recieve any reply until now. If you think my
question is not clear or can be solve by simply reading some man
page/source code, please tell me. I am a newbie here. So please do not
hesitate to give me
:I am getting strange behaviour with rfork(RFMEM) on a ~2 week old
:kernel. The following code illustrates it. For all the world, the
:stack appears to be shareable after the fork. This is clearly wrong,
:since pid was at some point different in parent and child for them
:to take the right case.
:
Thus spake James Howard ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> fairings? Why does it matter what color the bikeshed is? What does
What is this thing with the bikesheds???
It appears on every place I am, on IRC, now here.
As a non-native English-speaker, I'd like to know what's up with the
poor bikesheds. T
hello all,
I have to set up a box able to run >5000 processes. I have the hardware
for it (i386 architecture, lots of RAM, lots of CPU power)
I'm playing with VM parameters, tuning everything possible, but can't get
more than 3800 - 4000 processes without getting the box unstable.
I need some h
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Wes Peters writes:
: Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
: >
: > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wri
: > tes:
: >
: > >So what does everyone think? Is it suitable to add a read only
: > >sysctl 'machdep.apm_powerstate' that reports either AC, nn%,
: > >or N/
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "Dave
Preece (KB Group)" writes:
: Possibly off topic, but here goes.
:
: I'm trying to use placement new with gcc 2.95.2 on FBSD4.0-Release and can't
: get it to go with an error:
:
: :11: too many arguments to function `void * operator new(unsigned
: int)'
:
:
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "Dave
Preece (KB Group)" writes:
: Panic over, #include solved that. You learn something new every day.
: No pun intended.
:
: Apologies for offtopicness. 50 lines of "I will look on deja next time".
You don't need to include new.h, and you shouldn't generally.
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Alexander Langer writes:
: What is this thing with the bikesheds???
Summary:
phk sent out a long message about how one can do huge things
w/o anybody complaining because they don't feel they are quailified
to. One cannot do small things without getting bogg
Warner Losh wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Wes Peters writes:
> : Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> : >
> : > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wri
> : > tes:
> : >
> : > >So what does everyone think? Is it suitable to add a read only
> : > >sysctl 'machdep.apm_powerstate' that
> On Mon, 17 Jul 2000 11:15:18 -0700
> Nick Sayer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
nsayer> The "why bother" is easy -- one should not have to belong to group
nsayer> operator to determine the current battery state. Too many things
nsayer> already have to be sgid (at least) without making this an
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Nick Sayer writes:
: The "why bother" is easy -- one should not have to belong to group
: operator to determine the current battery state. Too many things
: already have to be sgid (at least) without making this another reason.
You should already be a member of grou
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Hajimu UMEMOTO writes:
: nsayer> The "why bother" is easy -- one should not have to belong to group
: nsayer> operator to determine the current battery state. Too many things
: nsayer> already have to be sgid (at least) without making this another reason.
: I love th
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Warner Losh writes:
: Yes. The right answer isn't to kludge this through a sysctl, but
: instead it is to fix apm to that it is safe to make it world read
: only. Is there a way inside a ioctl to see if you have something open
: for write access?
OK. I found the
> On Mon, 17 Jul 2000 13:14:24 -0600
> Warner Losh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
imp> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Hajimu UMEMOTO writes:
imp> : nsayer> The "why bother" is easy -- one should not have to belong to group
imp> : nsayer> operator to determine the current battery state. Too man
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Hajimu UMEMOTO writes:
: Indeed, I wish to have a method to obtain required information without
: extra privilege. We need safety way.
: Currentry, GKrellM opens /dev/apm with O_RDWR. I just tried to open
: with O_RDONLY and see it is sufficient for APMIO_GETINFO.
> On Mon, 17 Jul 2000 13:45:29 -0600
> Warner Losh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
imp> It is sufficient for APMIO_GETINFO, but it will introduce a security
imp> hole as the apm ioctls aren't careful enough about their sanity
imp> checking. I've added such sanity checking in my local copy of a
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Hajimu UMEMOTO writes:
: ports/sysutils/gkrellm/ :-)
ah. ok. I feel dumb now... :-)
thank you umemoto-san.
Warner
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
newsfeed-inn2# Jul 17 10:14:07 newsfeed-inn2
/kernel: pmap_collect: collecting pv entries -- suggest increasing
PMAP_SHPGPERPROC
Don't see this one in LINT.
Anybody have any wild guesses as to good values?
newsfeed-inn2# sysctl -a | grep shm
kern.ipc.shmmax: 4194304
kern.ipc.shmmin: 1
kern.ip
I am writing a KLD that gives me kernel fault each time I run 'ps' command
after 'make unload'. The KLD has a system call to create several kernel
threads by calling kthread_create(). During unload, I set flags to each
threads so that they will call exit1() upon wakeup (sleep on a timeout).
Be
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Alexander Langer writ
es:
>Thus spake James Howard ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
>
>> fairings? Why does it matter what color the bikeshed is? What does
>
>What is this thing with the bikesheds???
>
>It appears on every place I am, on IRC, now here.
>
>As a non-native Engl
On Mon, Jul 17, 2000 at 07:52:01PM +0200, Gergely EGERVARY wrote:
> hello all,
>
> I have to set up a box able to run >5000 processes. I have the hardware
> for it (i386 architecture, lots of RAM, lots of CPU power)
>
> I'm playing with VM parameters, tuning everything possible, but can't get
>
Nick Sayer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Cyrille Lefevre wrote:
>
> > Nick Sayer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > > Cyrille Lefevre wrote:
> > >
> > > > Poul-Henning Kamp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > >
> > > > > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>wri
> > > > > tes:
> > >
Nick Sayer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Warner Losh wrote:
>
> > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Wes Peters writes:
> > : Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> > : >
> > : > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wri
> > : > tes:
> > : >
> > : > >So what does everyone think? Is it suitable to ad
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cyrille Lefevre writes:
: well. as you said before, you just want a read-only sysctl. if the driver is not
: secure. it's not my fault. it shouldn't be so complicated to secure it.
: do you now if the permissions sets using make_dev() in i386/apm/apm.h are
: used at
26 matches
Mail list logo
