On Tue, 4 Jul 2000, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> On Sun, 2 Jul 2000, Nick Rogness wrote:
>
> > On Sun, 2 Jul 2000, Stephen Hocking wrote:
> >
> > > Has anyone done this yet? I've just acquired this shiny new cable modem and
> > > would like to have secure access to my place of work (even though they
hi all
inside kernel (in my syscall) i need to lock some data sturctures.
how can i do it?
-av
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
hi, there!
do the latest news concerned crypto stuff mean that we can now always have
DES in base system? and what's about a possibility to select Crypt Format
(DES/MD5/SHA/whatever) per user or per login class?
/fjoe
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ha
Hi ...
I've started natd on my local machine to translate all packets
to the ip of my public interface.
If I am on my machine, and I start natd and add the divert rule,
(this means I'm trying to connect from my local machine on which I am
running the natd to any other machine) I can see the pack
On Tue, 27 Jun 2000, Steve Kargl wrote:
> Daniel Eischen wrote:
> >
> > Oddly, this causes problems with GNAT (Ada is a high level language)
> > because it wants/expects 64-bit extended precision. It seems as if
> > GNAT for linux-i386 also uses 64-bit extended precision. The only
> > other G
On Sun, 2 Jul 2000, Soren Schmidt wrote:
> It seems Julian Elischer wrote:
> > I am working on UDF support.
> > I have at present a program that reads a udf filesystem
> > and am working (today) on making it into an "mtools" like
> > program that allows access to the contents in a useful manner.
Hi there.
I have been a Linux user for about 2 years now and I use it mainly at home on my
desktop computer to do all the usual stuff Iike programming, office work,
whatever comes handy.
Until some time ago I had a regular modem dial-up connection to my ISP, which
was recently upgraded to a ISDN
I sent this to stable, to a deafening silence. I'm therefore forwarding
it to hackers as well.
Well, I had three panics from this today (the first was accidental when I
went to a webpage with music attached; the other two were me trying to get
a good dump). I got some info from the dump. The m
Last night I finally got around to building up my first "real" 4.0-RELEASE
machine (kind "late" since 4.1 is creeping up on us I know ... but ).
I installed 4.0 "fresh" from the CDs, copied my previous machine's /etc files
over from a CD backup (with minor edits of course :), cvsup'ed 4-STAB
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> David Malone writes:
: I can't find my second edition at the moment. This behavior is
: commented on in the C FAQ as something the ANSI standard describes
: as a common extension. (http://www.eskimo.com/~scs/C-faq/q1.7.html)
: It also seems to suggest it is mostly a
On Wed, 5 Jul 2000, Reinier Bezuidenhout wrote:
> Hi ...
>
> I've started natd on my local machine to translate all packets
> to the ip of my public interface.
>
> If I am on my machine, and I start natd and add the divert rule,
> (this means I'm trying to connect from my local machine on which
-hackers,
This is the most fucked up thing I've ever experienced with FreeBSD:
[hawk-billf] /home/billf/helpdesk > ls
./ ../ Makefilehdesk.c
[hawk-billf] /home/billf/helpdesk > cd ..
[hawk-billf] /home/billf > ls hdesk
ls: hdesk: No such file or directory
[hawk-b
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "Alexey V. Vatchenko" writes:
: /dev/ad0s2a: NO WRITE ACCESS
: /dev/ad0s2a: UNEXPECTED INCONSISTENCY; RUN fsck MANUALLY.
:
: what is it?
/ is likely mounted on /dev/ad0s2a, so you can't get write access to
/dev/ad0s2a.
Warner
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL
On Wed, 5 Jul 2000, Max Khon wrote:
> do the latest news concerned crypto stuff mean that we can now always have
> DES in base system? and what's about a possibility to select Crypt Format
> (DES/MD5/SHA/whatever) per user or per login class?
No, that code is still not finished. I'm currently si
At 02:23 PM 7/1/00 -0700, you wrote:
>On Sat, 1 Jul 2000, Dennis wrote:
>
>> We're seeing lots of "stray" interrupts in 4.0 while running 3.4 on the
>> same hardware reports nothing. The interrupt its complaining about is IRQ7
>> even though parallel port is disabled and no other device. It happen
Ben Smithurst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Brian Somers wrote:
>
> >> Well, "periodic security" will work as long as /etc/periodic/security
> >> exists, so I guess you just mean the docs need updating? I'll get to
> >> that if someone is actually planning on committing this stuff.
> >=20
> > P
On Wed, Jul 05, 2000 at 04:08:24PM -0400, Bill Fumerola wrote:
> PS. No, it's not something stupid like file flags or something.
No, it was something even stupider. Completely ignore this.
--
Bill Fumerola - Network Architect / Computer Horizons Corp - CHIMES
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] / [EMAIL
> At 02:23 PM 7/1/00 -0700, you wrote:
> >On Sat, 1 Jul 2000, Dennis wrote:
> >
> >> We're seeing lots of "stray" interrupts in 4.0 while running 3.4 on the
> >> same hardware reports nothing. The interrupt its complaining about is IRQ7
> >> even though parallel port is disabled and no other devic
> > I don't think there's really a problem with just running security
> > from daily. I can add a note that this is normal practice in the
> > manpage, and that security shouldn't be run separately unless you set
> > daily_security_enable=3DNO or whatever the option is.
>
> why not even somethin
Bill Fumerola wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 05, 2000 at 04:08:24PM -0400, Bill Fumerola wrote:
>
> > PS. No, it's not something stupid like file flags or something.
>
> No, it was something even stupider. Completely ignore this.
Oh, come on now, tell us the details! :-)
Cheers,
-Peter
--
Peter Wemm - [
On Wed, Jul 05, 2000 at 05:57:56PM -0700, Peter Wemm wrote:
> > > PS. No, it's not something stupid like file flags or something.
> >
> > No, it was something even stupider. Completely ignore this.
>
> Oh, come on now, tell us the details! :-)
It involves this running in another window:
[hawk
On 06-Jul-00 Bill Fumerola wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 05, 2000 at 05:57:56PM -0700, Peter Wemm wrote:
>
>> > > PS. No, it's not something stupid like file flags or something.
>> >
>> > No, it was something even stupider. Completely ignore this.
>>
>> Oh, come on now, tell us the details! :-)
>
> It
Is there an option in make world to work like a traditional make works?
i.e. just recompile if the source has changed.
Leif
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
On Thu, Jul 06, 2000 at 03:46:52AM +0200, Leif Neland wrote:
> Is there an option in make world to work like a traditional make works?
> i.e. just recompile if the source has changed.
-DNOCLEAN is as close as you're going to get, probably.
--
Bill Fumerola - Network Architect / Computer Horizo
Title: RE: BPF and Promiscuous Mode
Here is how to bridge different interfaces together selectively:
Controlling bridging
Bridging is almost exclusively controlled by sysctl variables.
net.link.ether.bridge_cfg: ed2:1,rl0:1,
set of interfaces for which bridging is enabled, and clust
25 matches
Mail list logo
