subscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
It seems Julian Elischer wrote:
> Does anyone KNOW of these working under the
> new drivers? What about setup?
They are supported by the ATA driver, setup as usual, ie none
they just work...
> I've seen plenty about people failing (in 98-99)
> to get tehm going but the archives are silent on th
How does handle it when one ups drives many machines?
Wire the ports in parallel, and have an ups-daemon on each?
Or just connect the ups port to one machine, and have this send a message
to the others when the power is failing?
And after a suitable time, turn off the ups regardless if the main
On 11-Jun-00 Leif Neland wrote:
> How does handle it when one ups drives many machines?
Use the NUT port.. /usr/ports/sysutils/nut/
Last I looked it was a little unpolished, but the basic framework is there to
have a single UPS work for multiple machines.
---
Daniel O'Connor software and netw
> subscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
send this to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
> Does anyone KNOW of these working under the
> new drivers? What about setup?
> I've seen plenty about people failing (in 98-99)
> to get tehm going but the archives are silent on the topic
> after that period. The hardware support lists don't mention
> them either.
They work OK, but you need t
Kelly Yancey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> If you up PMAP_SHPGPERPROC, you increase the number of
> pv_entries created at boot time. However, I am not informed enough
> to say how high you can safely increase PMAP_SHPGPERPROC.
What is the upper bound related to? What are the dangers in increasing
It seems Mike Smith wrote:
> > Does anyone KNOW of these working under the
> > new drivers? What about setup?
> > I've seen plenty about people failing (in 98-99)
> > to get tehm going but the archives are silent on the topic
> > after that period. The hardware support lists don't mention
> > the
> It seems Mike Smith wrote:
> > > Does anyone KNOW of these working under the
> > > new drivers? What about setup?
> > > I've seen plenty about people failing (in 98-99)
> > > to get tehm going but the archives are silent on the topic
> > > after that period. The hardware support lists don't men
On Sun, 11 Jun 2000, Dave Hayes wrote:
> Kelly Yancey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > If you up PMAP_SHPGPERPROC, you increase the number of
> > pv_entries created at boot time. However, I am not informed enough
> > to say how high you can safely increase PMAP_SHPGPERPROC.
>
> What is the upper
I'm running a 700Mhz K7 with 256M of RAM as my workstation. I have
two fast SCSI drives with a Gig of swap between them. The system
shouldn't normally be a bottleneck as a workstation.
I find, however, that there seem to be some bad worst-case senerios
popping up rather often.
Netscape is a go
:I'm running a 700Mhz K7 with 256M of RAM as my workstation. I have
:two fast SCSI drives with a Gig of swap between them. The system
:shouldn't normally be a bottleneck as a workstation.
:
:I find, however, that there seem to be some bad worst-case senerios
:popping up rather often.
:...
> "Matthew" == Matthew Dillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Matthew> :Now the application in question (Netscape) usually runs
Matthew> around 50 to :75 megs, so that swapping activity is
Matthew> effectively swapping an amount
Matthew> 50-75MB is a lot, but if you have 256MB of ram it can'
:Believe me, I look at these things. Yes there is a lot going on and a
:lot using memory. I normally have about 20% to 25% of my Gig of swap
:used... meaning that I have allocated roughly double my RAM in
:applications.
:
:And when this worst-case happens, memory is full... but the only
:active
Matthew Dillon wrote:
>
> :Believe me, I look at these things. Yes there is a lot going on and a
> :lot using memory. I normally have about 20% to 25% of my Gig of swap
> :used... meaning that I have allocated roughly double my RAM in
> :applications.
> :
> :And when this worst-case happens,
Kent Stewart drunkenly mumbled...
>
> Netscape reallys goes to pot in a hurry if you allow it to use more
> than 1-2MB of memory cache. A friend was seeing a terrible response
> and tracked it back to Netscape's memory cache. He had a lot of memory
> and started out with something on the order of
Mike Smith wrote:
>
> > Does anyone KNOW of these working under the
> > new drivers? What about setup?
> > I've seen plenty about people failing (in 98-99)
> > to get tehm going but the archives are silent on the topic
> > after that period. The hardware support lists don't mention
> > them eithe
How does one get the environment passed from the loader to the
kernel from userland?
Yes, I see the sysctl_kernenv in kern_environment.c, but I'm having
trouble decyphering as how to use it.
thanks,
-Alfred
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in th
> How does one get the environment passed from the loader to the
> kernel from userland?
>
> Yes, I see the sysctl_kernenv in kern_environment.c, but I'm having
> trouble decyphering as how to use it.
Use the sysctl lookup function to get the OID for kern.environment, then
tack an integer on th
On Sun, 11 Jun 2000, Brian Hechinger wrote:
:Kent Stewart drunkenly mumbled...
:>
:> Netscape reallys goes to pot in a hurry if you allow it to use more
:> than 1-2MB of memory cache. A friend was seeing a terrible response
:> and tracked it back to Netscape's memory cache. He had a lot of memor
20 matches
Mail list logo
