[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Matthew Dillon) writes:
> The question is: What am I forgetting to do? Or is this a bug in our
> IPSEC implementation?
AFAIK this is more or less how it's supposed to work. IPsec is a
mess. Security associations are not stateless, ESP provides replay
protection us
:
:
:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Matthew Dillon) writes:
:
:> The question is: What am I forgetting to do? Or is this a bug in our
:> IPSEC implementation?
:
:AFAIK this is more or less how it's supposed to work. IPsec is a
:mess. Security associations are not stateless, ESP provides replay
:p
> IPSec isn't well documented, but once I figured out the config
> file it didn't seem too bad. I am guessing that replay prevention
Reading the RFCs might be more helpful than most of the KAME
documentation. There's also a lot of undocumented stuff for which the
sources seem to be the
On Thu, May 11, 2000 at 08:33:45AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > A while back, I wrote a simplistic, but effect script to print out
> > information about who has a particular port open.
>
> There is already a nice program to do this as part of the standard
> FreeBSD distribution: sockstat.
On Thu, 11 May 2000, Matthew Dillon wrote:
> I had to fix up /etc/rc.network a little to load the ipsec rules
> at the appropriate point (just after the interface and ipfw setup,
> but before any services (like NFS) are run). I am going to put the
> (relatively simple) patch for
Hi,
can I install FreeBSD 4.0R on a IBM PS/2 Model 65SX with 8MB Ram
and 2 SCSI HDD of 120MB each?
The netowrk card is an WD8003 and the SCSI Controller is Based on Adaptec
AIC-6250EL.
regards,
Gheorghe ARDELEAN
West Univ. Of Timisoara
Dept. of Theoretical and Computational Physics
V. Parva
Jordan said that the kernel SMP thread is ready in CURRENT FreeBSD,
but I could not find any document for the SMP kthread.
By looking at the kern/kern_kthread.c code, it does not look like a SMP
thread, and does not even have mutex functions in there.
Does any one happen to know where is the SMP
Matthew Dillon wrote:
> If they are hidden (masquarading as some other typical process
> name), you can track them down with 'netstat -taA' to get the
> protocol address of the socket and then fstat to figure out which
> process owns the socket.
sockstat is your friend, if you're
> Jordan said that the kernel SMP thread is ready in CURRENT FreeBSD,
> but I could not find any document for the SMP kthread.
Huh? I never said any such thing. You must have misinterpreted
something else I said.
- Jordan
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freeb
> > Jordan said that the kernel SMP thread is ready in CURRENT FreeBSD,
> > but I could not find any document for the SMP kthread.
>
> Huh? I never said any such thing. You must have misinterpreted
> something else I said.
I asked a question "Is FreeBSD working on SMP thread?" at both USENIX
a
Hi all,
I have a 4-STABLE kernel that panics at boot. How do I force the kernel
to core dump?
I know that the handbook says to build a debug kernel and to set the
dump device via (dumpon + /etc/rc.conf) but in this case the kernel
panics during booting. The handbook says that, if the kernel pani
If memory serves me right, Marc van Kempen wrote:
> The problem is that the ALIGN macro is not being
> picked up even though and are included.
> The problem arises from the use of the CMSG_DATA macro, which seems to
> be related to sendmsg(), and uses the ALIGN macro.
>
> The manual page for
> I asked a question "Is FreeBSD working on SMP thread?" at both USENIX
> and FreeBSDcon last year, you answered that it is already in the kernel,
> but there is no API for userland. Maybe we misunderstund each other :-(
I answered that we had *kernel* threads but that there was no native
API yet
On Thu, May 11, 2000 at 12:20:38PM -0700, Marco Molteni wrote:
>
> I have a 4-STABLE kernel that panics at boot. How do I force the kernel
> to core dump?
>
> I know that the handbook says to build a debug kernel and to set the
> dump device via (dumpon + /etc/rc.conf) but in this case the kerne
At 1:02 PM -0400 5/10/00, Ted Buswell wrote:
>Right now, you could write a shell script to create all of
>the various permutations of printer shares, each one with
>an appropriate "print command" directive in your smb.conf.
We have >200 printers in printcap, and each of those printers
has at leas
At 12:14 PM -0400 5/10/00, Tim Vanderhoek wrote:
>On Wed, May 10, Garance A Drosihn wrote:
> >
> > 1990's) with the extra features we've added. Once I have
> > things sorted out, I'll have a number of updates to offer.
>
>Cool!
>
> > [...]
>
>If you are hoping to have a serious discussion, a care
Garance A Drosihn writes:
> At 1:02 PM -0400 5/10/00, Ted Buswell wrote:
> >Right now, you could write a shell script to create all of
> >the various permutations of printer shares, each one with
> >an appropriate "print command" directive in your smb.conf.
>
> We have >200 printers in pri
On Wed, May 10, 2000 at 11:11:23PM -0600, Wes Peters wrote:
> > I've asked that people with pccard pr's also cc me or send me
> > numbers. This has helped somewhat, but I'd like an easier to deal
> > with bug mechanism.
>
> Have we given up on Keystone, or is it still under consideration?
I wo
Gheorghe Ardelean wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> can I install FreeBSD 4.0R on a IBM PS/2 Model 65SX with 8MB Ram
> and 2 SCSI HDD of 120MB each?
>
> The netowrk card is an WD8003 and the SCSI Controller is Based on Adaptec
> AIC-6250EL.
>
> regards,
>
> Gheorghe ARDELEAN
>
> West Univ. Of Timisoara
> D
On Thursday, 11 May 2000 at 13:03:59 -0700, Brian O'Shea wrote:
> On Thu, May 11, 2000 at 12:20:38PM -0700, Marco Molteni wrote:
>>
>> I have a 4-STABLE kernel that panics at boot. How do I force the kernel
>> to core dump?
>>
>> I know that the handbook says to build a debug kernel and to set the
Warner Losh wrote:
>
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sergey Babkin writes:
> : Seems like most of the modern machines just don't have that
> : pin on the PCI bus connected anywhere. But on most of them
> : (though not all) the pin on ISA works. Some high-end machines
> : like Unisys or Compaq ha
On Thu, May 11, 2000 at 04:43:25PM -0400, Garance A Drosihn wrote:
>
> Hmm. I always assumed that was for "big freebsd architectural
> changes", as opposed to changes to a "little program" like lpr.
I'd rather see a discussion about designing new features for lpr on
-arch than I would see a dis
Hello,
I am getting the following error after I upgraded from 3.4 to 4.0 on my
Firewall server:
tl0: got an invalid interrupt!
tl1: got an invalid interrupt!
Network services seem ok, but it is throwing this error constantly.
It is a cvsup of 4.0 -stable as of a few days ago.
The hardware
> Jordan said that the kernel SMP thread is ready in CURRENT FreeBSD,
> but I could not find any document for the SMP kthread.
>
> By looking at the kern/kern_kthread.c code, it does not look like a SMP
> thread, and does not even have mutex functions in there.
>
> Does any one happen to know wh
Hello,
I've 3 small programs. First one writes 4K of data contains 'A's into a
file /tmp/pagetest and then lseek() to the begin of the file.
Second one writes 4K of 'Z' into the same file /tmp/pagetest and
then lseek() to the begin of the file. They both do that in a tight
loop. Now, the thir
> > I asked a question "Is FreeBSD working on SMP thread?" at both USENIX
> > and FreeBSDcon last year, you answered that it is already in the kernel,
> > but there is no API for userland. Maybe we misunderstund each other :-(
>
> I answered that we had *kernel* threads but that there was no nati
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (FengYue) writes:
> I've 3 small programs. First one writes 4K of data contains 'A's into a
> file /tmp/pagetest and then lseek() to the begin of the file.
> Second one writes 4K of 'Z' into the same file /tmp/pagetest and
> then lseek() to the begin of the file. They both do
On Mon, 24 Apr 2000, Kent Stewart wrote:
> This is what I see on a buildworld with 4.0-Stable
>
> Modified /etc/make.conf and commented out CFLAGS= -Os -pipe
> 3707.4u 799.6s 1:35:52.46 78.3% 1374+1477k 56974+173232io 2337pf+0w
> 3693.9u 800.5s 1:29:45.73 83.4% 1375+1477k 55201+173224io 2160pf+0
On Thu, May 11, 2000 at 08:33:45AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > A while back, I wrote a simplistic, but effect script to print out
> > information about who has a particular port open.
>
> There is already a nice program to do this as part of the standard
> FreeBSD distribution: sockstat.
In muc.lists.freebsd.ports, you wrote:
>
> Do you happen to know if Xosview can be made to show both CPU's in SMP
> FreeBsd. I've just swapped from Linux to FreeBsd .
See the patches I mailed to freebsd-hackers late last year. You need to
patch both the kernel and the userland. I'm a litt
On Thu, 11 May 2000, Dutch Collins wrote:
> Gheorghe Ardelean wrote:
> > can I install FreeBSD 4.0R on a IBM PS/2 Model 65SX with 8MB Ram
> > and 2 SCSI HDD of 120MB each?
> >
> > The netowrk card is an WD8003 and the SCSI Controller is Based on Adaptec
> > AIC-6250EL.
>
> NetBSD has a patch for
Arun Sharma wrote:
>
> In muc.lists.freebsd.ports, you wrote:
> >
> > Do you happen to know if Xosview can be made to show both CPU's in SMP
> > FreeBsd. I've just swapped from Linux to FreeBsd .
>
> See the patches I mailed to freebsd-hackers late last year. You need to
> patch both the k
32 matches
Mail list logo
