Hail!
Is raid5 in vinum officially broken in 4.x branch?
I can't get stable system (make buildworld at least) on both
ata+(dual celeron) and ahc(7896)+(dual PIII). OS still hangs while
'make buildworld' on raid5 volume proceed.
"vinum raid5-panic tentitive patch" by Matt Dillon doesn't h
Ming Zhang wrote:
>
> Is there a MT-safe implementation of gethostbyname() in FreeBSD (3.4/4.0)?
>
> On Solaris there is gethostbyname_r(). Calling gethostbyname() with in
> two threads cause both threads to block.
>
> I know the "struct hostent" is static in gethostbyname(), however it seems
On Sunday, 16 April 2000 at 11:02:45 +0400, Alex Zakirov wrote:
> Hail!
>
> Is raid5 in vinum officially broken in 4.x branch?
Not completely. We have a number of problems which only show up in
some configurations.
> I can't get stable system (make buildworld at least) on both
> ata+(dual
I have to malloc a lot of memory in the kernel, hence a few
questions:
1. The data must be absolutely present at all times, no page
faults or locking mechanisms, etc. Does that mean
I should use kmem_alloc_wired() or am I misunderstanding its purpose?
Does it make sense to alloc less than a pagef
It seems Anatoly Vorobey wrote:
>
> Of course, with all those new keys on all those keyboards, we should
> perhaps think about whether to add all of them as new keycodes,
> and if so, in which order, etc. I've no idea if FreeBSD's concept
> of 'keycode' (i.e. key number independent of keyboard mo
On Sat, 15 Apr 2000, Zhihui Zhang wrote:
>
> I have two unrelated questions I can not figure out myself:
> (2) I am trying to display kernel profiling sysctl variables with sysctl
> -a or sysctl -A without success. They are defined in subr_prof.c. Why
> sysctl command can not display them? I c
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Anatoly Vorobey writes
:
>I have to malloc a lot of memory in the kernel, hence a few
>questions:
How much is "a lot" ?
>1. The data must be absolutely present at all times, no page
>faults or locking mechanisms, etc. Does that mean
>I should use kmem_alloc_wired(
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Andrzej B
ialecki writes:
>On Sat, 15 Apr 2000, Zhihui Zhang wrote:
>
>>
>> I have two unrelated questions I can not figure out myself:
>
>> (2) I am trying to display kernel profiling sysctl variables with sysctl
>> -a or sysctl -A without success. They are defin
On Sun, Apr 16, 2000 at 03:36:31PM +0200, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Anatoly Vorobey writes
> :
> >I have to malloc a lot of memory in the kernel, hence a few
> >questions:
>
> How much is "a lot" ?
Apparently somewhere in the vicinity of 8Mb, and also coming in a
I notice that the IDEA code in OpenSSL is in the Attic and not in
the regular source tree. I know that OpenSSL is compiled with
something like -DNO_IDEA by default, but that doesn't mean IDEA
shouldn't be in the source tree for people who can use it. Would
it be possible to get idea reinstated and
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Soren Schmidt writes:
: I modelled them after SCO UNIX 3.2 way back when, I know that upto
: some point I kept the keymaps compatible to SCO's, but I think that
: got broken since
I don't think SCO does these new keys. If I do anything in this area,
I'll check
:I have to malloc a lot of memory in the kernel, hence a few
:questions:
:
:1. The data must be absolutely present at all times, no page
:faults or locking mechanisms, etc. Does that mean
:I should use kmem_alloc_wired() or am I misunderstanding its purpose?
:Does it make sense to alloc less than
: Hail!
:
:Is raid5 in vinum officially broken in 4.x branch?
:I can't get stable system (make buildworld at least) on both
:ata+(dual celeron) and ahc(7896)+(dual PIII). OS still hangs while
:'make buildworld' on raid5 volume proceed.
:
:"vinum raid5-panic tentitive patch" by Matt Dillon do
On Sat, 15 Apr 2000, Zhihui Zhang wrote:
>
> I have two unrelated questions I can not figure out myself:
>
> (1) Does FreeBSD NFS implementation support "noac" to disable attribute
> cache? I know this is not good for performance.
>
It seems to me that FreeBSD does not have the mount option
On Sun, 16 Apr 2000, David Malone wrote:
> I notice that the IDEA code in OpenSSL is in the Attic and not in
> the regular source tree. I know that OpenSSL is compiled with
> something like -DNO_IDEA by default, but that doesn't mean IDEA
> shouldn't be in the source tree for people who can use i
> > (According to Applied Cryptography, IDEA is free for non-comercial
> > use. As the source code is being distributed via cvs anyway, I
> > can't see a reason why it isn't being included in any of the
> > branches.)
>
> I was under the impression it was restricted (patented) in the US and in
>
16 matches
Mail list logo
