Hi,
Note that this was a Cyrix 686 M-266 which should have a native/real clockspeed of
200Mhz
After trying all kinds of permutations of:
voltage
clockspeed
caches
and multiplier
It has become clear:
the CPU doesn't really care for 2.9 or 2.8 volt
But
it really does
Len Conrad wrote:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] tells me their P1200 E1 card, with FreeBSD drive, can't
> work in channelized mode (like the etinc cards can't). Their LMC150xM
> cards can do channelized, but don't have a FreeBSD driver, but their
> FreeBSD guy is looking at it.
>
> Any hacker care to e
> Len Conrad wrote:
> >
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] tells me their P1200 E1 card, with FreeBSD drive, can't
> > work in channelized mode (like the etinc cards can't). Their LMC150xM
> > cards can do channelized, but don't have a FreeBSD driver, but their
> > FreeBSD guy is looking at it.
> >
> > Any
Hi Louie,
>You've got to look at what you're actually getting as a delivered capability.
What we are looking for is just 30 x 64 kbit incoming ISDN channels for
remote access to Internet. "remote access concentrator".
>channels. Some of them might be combined with others to provide Nx64kb/s
> Hi Louie,
>
> >You've got to look at what you're actually getting as a delivered capability.
>
> What we are looking for is just 30 x 64 kbit incoming ISDN channels for
> remote access to Internet. "remote access concentrator".
>
> >channels. Some of them might be combined with others to p
Some people don't like embedded HTML mail, especially if they aren't using
something that uses it, such as Netscape. Cutting and pasting is just as easy.
Personally, I like the idea of using links in mail. I just decided to go for
the lowest common denominator.
-Original Message
Jeroen Ruigrok/Asmodai writes:
> >I would have thought you would use the tee option in ipfw for this, but
> >its not implemented yet according to my man pages, so I was wondering if
> >there was another way to do this, cause it makes traffic analysis a hell
> >of a lot easier if I can do this rath
Louis A. Mamakos writes:
> > What we are looking for is just 30 x 64 kbit incoming ISDN channels for
> > remote access to Internet. "remote access concentrator".
> >
> > >channels. Some of them might be combined with others to provide Nx64kb/s
> >
> > I see the Portmaster 3 can bond channels
Potts, Ross wrote:
> Some people don't like embedded HTML mail, especially if they aren't
> using something that uses it, such as Netscape. Cutting and pasting
> is just as easy.
uh... I think Wes just meant post the complete URL (actually,
that's what he said), i.e. stick http:// on the front
"Potts, Ross" wrote:
>
> Some people don't like embedded HTML mail, especially if they aren't using
> something that uses it, such as Netscape. Cutting and pasting is just as easy.
> Personally, I like the idea of using links in mail. I just decided to go for
> the lowest common denominator.
T
On Wed, Feb 09, 2000 at 08:56:09PM -0500, Colin wrote:
>
> As interesting as this looks, unfortunately the license it comes with
> efffectively precludes incorporating it into FreeBSD. The license is
> for single-user non-commercial only. They also included derivative
> works in the restriction
+[ Giorgos Keramidas ]-
| On Wed, Feb 09, 2000 at 08:56:09PM -0500, Colin wrote:
| >
| > As interesting as this looks, unfortunately the license it comes with
| > efffectively precludes incorporating it into FreeBSD. The license is
| > for single-u
L.S.
Here are patches for FreeBSD's ls (from version 3.3 release) and
OpenBSD's ls (version 2.6, didn't actually test this obsd patch as I'm
working on a FreeBSD machine at the moment).
What it does is add an option (yes another one) to sort alpha & numeric
separately, i.e. instead of something
On Friday, February 11, 2000, W.H.Scholten wrote:
> I've also attached a complete little test program with debug output etc.
> The code could be improved by renaming some variables to longer names
> (couldn't think of any good ones ;) and probably the implementation too
> (haven't tried to optimiz
Since everyone seems to be jumping up and down on this, I thought I'd
just chime in with my two cents on the matter.
I saw the Lucent folks behind this when they first brought a demo of
Eclipse to FreeBSDCon '99 and, frankly, I was just pleased that they
were willing to show up as exhibitors and
Is there a good reference URL for configuring FreeBSD with large
amounts of RAM? I seem to remember there being "issues" with over
1GB but I don't remember the details and the search engine on
www.freebsd.org is currently down.
/\/\ \/\/
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "un
16 matches
Mail list logo
