On Tue, 3 Aug 1999, Nik Clayton wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 01, 1999 at 03:00:49PM -0400, Brian F. Feldman wrote:
> > Judging by your description, why don't we use LyX? :) LaTeX sounds about
> > right.
>
> Argh -- contextual sense of humour failure. Smiley not withstanding, I
> can't decide if the abo
On Sun, Aug 01, 1999 at 03:00:49PM -0400, Brian F. Feldman wrote:
> Judging by your description, why don't we use LyX? :) LaTeX sounds about
> right.
Argh -- contextual sense of humour failure. Smiley not withstanding, I
can't decide if the above question was asked in all seriousness or not.
N
On Tue, 3 Aug 1999, Nik Clayton wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 01, 1999 at 03:00:49PM -0400, Brian F. Feldman wrote:
> > Judging by your description, why don't we use LyX? :) LaTeX sounds about
> > right.
>
> Argh -- contextual sense of humour failure. Smiley not withstanding, I
> can't decide if the ab
On Sun, Aug 01, 1999 at 03:00:49PM -0400, Brian F. Feldman wrote:
> Judging by your description, why don't we use LyX? :) LaTeX sounds about
> right.
Argh -- contextual sense of humour failure. Smiley not withstanding, I
can't decide if the above question was asked in all seriousness or not.
N
, 1999 9:20 PM
> To: Alton, Matthew
> Cc: 'Nik Clayton'; David E. Cross; freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
> Subject: Re: RE: DOC volunteer WAS:RE: userfs help needed.
>
>
> :Anyway, Mr. Dillon, once I have a development box to smack around, I
> :intend to start with
eebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG; d...@freebsd.org
> Subject: Re: DOC volunteer WAS:RE: userfs help needed.
>
> [ cc'd to -doc, reply-to points there ]
>
> On Fri, Jul 30, 1999 at 04:09:20PM -0500, Alton, Matthew wrote:
> > I prefer to work in flat ASCII. Perhaps the doc
20 PM
> To: Alton, Matthew
> Cc: 'Nik Clayton'; David E. Cross; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: RE: DOC volunteer WAS:RE: userfs help needed.
>
>
> :Anyway, Mr. Dillon, once I have a development box to smack around, I
> :intend to start with your suggestion of
; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: DOC volunteer WAS:RE: userfs help needed.
>
> [ cc'd to -doc, reply-to points there ]
>
> On Fri, Jul 30, 1999 at 04:09:20PM -0500, Alton, Matthew wrote:
> > I prefer to work in flat ASCII. Perhaps the doc project can HTMLize
Judging by your description, why don't we use LyX? :) LaTeX sounds about
right.
Brian Fundakowski Feldman _ __ ___ ___ ___ ___
gr...@freebsd.org _ __ ___ | _ ) __| \
FreeBSD: The Power to Serve!_ __ | _ \._ \ |) |
http://www.FreeBSD.org/
Judging by your description, why don't we use LyX? :) LaTeX sounds about
right.
Brian Fundakowski Feldman _ __ ___ ___ ___ ___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ __ ___ | _ ) __| \
FreeBSD: The Power to Serve!_ __ | _ \._ \ |) |
http://www.FreeBSD.org/
[ cc'd to -doc, reply-to points there ]
On Fri, Jul 30, 1999 at 04:09:20PM -0500, Alton, Matthew wrote:
> I prefer to work in flat ASCII. Perhaps the doc project can HTMLize
> the final product.
We can, it just takes longer, that's all.
It would make life simpler if you can follow the general s
[ cc'd to -doc, reply-to points there ]
On Fri, Jul 30, 1999 at 04:09:20PM -0500, Alton, Matthew wrote:
> I prefer to work in flat ASCII. Perhaps the doc project can HTMLize
> the final product.
We can, it just takes longer, that's all.
It would make life simpler if you can follow the general
:Anyway, Mr. Dillon, once I have a development box to smack around, I
:intend to start with your suggestion of implementing a filesystem
:of my own concoction by returning an error for all VOP calls and
:issuing a kernel printf. How visible will the new VOP code be to
:me at this level? The Peng
:Anyway, Mr. Dillon, once I have a development box to smack around, I
:intend to start with your suggestion of implementing a filesystem
:of my own concoction by returning an error for all VOP calls and
:issuing a kernel printf. How visible will the new VOP code be to
:me at this level? The Pen
ORG
Subject: Re: DOC volunteer WAS:RE: userfs help needed.
On Thu, Jul 29, 1999 at 10:45:51AM -0500, Alton, Matthew wrote:
> I ran screaming into the woods last year from trying to grok VOP_foo. The
> prospect of a rewrite fills me with warmth and fuzziness. I hereby volunteer
> to maintain the
ag
and drop right into the new model and build like the very wind.
Thanks
-Original Message-
From: Nik Clayton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, July 30, 1999 05:09
To: Alton, Matthew
Cc: 'Matthew Dillon'; David E. Cross; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: DOC volunteer
On Thu, Jul 29, 1999 at 10:45:51AM -0500, Alton, Matthew wrote:
> I ran screaming into the woods last year from trying to grok VOP_foo. The
> prospect of a rewrite fills me with warmth and fuzziness. I hereby volunteer
> to maintain the VOP(9) man pages and to flesh out my notes into a big, beefy
On Thu, Jul 29, 1999 at 10:45:51AM -0500, Alton, Matthew wrote:
> I ran screaming into the woods last year from trying to grok VOP_foo. The
> prospect of a rewrite fills me with warmth and fuzziness. I hereby volunteer
> to maintain the VOP(9) man pages and to flesh out my notes into a big, beefy
From: Matthew Dillon [SMTP:dil...@apollo.backplane.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 28, 1999 6:31 PM
> To: David E. Cross
> Cc: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
> Subject: Re: userfs help needed.
>
> :I am wading through the portalfs and nullfs source, but I am desperately
> :
From: Matthew Dillon [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 28, 1999 6:31 PM
> To: David E. Cross
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: userfs help needed.
>
> :I am wading through the portalfs and nullfs source, but I am desperately
> :lost. I woul
On Wed, 28 Jul 1999, David E. Cross wrote:
> I am wading through the portalfs and nullfs source, but I am desperately
> lost. I would love to be able to find out who would be willing to help out
> with questions. I feel I would be spamming far too many people by just
> sending
> to -hackers.
M
On Wed, 28 Jul 1999, Matthew Dillon wrote:
> Ouch. I don't think anyone understands the VOP stuff completely. It's
> a big mess -- which is why it's going to be rewritten later this year.
>
> Your best bet is to study the implementation of the UFS/FFS filesystem.
well, i'd do v9f
:I am wading through the portalfs and nullfs source, but I am desperately
:lost. I would love to be able to find out who would be willing to help out
:with questions. I feel I would be spamming far too many people by just sending
:to -hackers. Some of the topics I am curious about are general fs
I am wading through the portalfs and nullfs source, but I am desperately
lost. I would love to be able to find out who would be willing to help out
with questions. I feel I would be spamming far too many people by just sending
to -hackers. Some of the topics I am curious about are general fs-sty
On Wed, 28 Jul 1999, David E. Cross wrote:
> I am wading through the portalfs and nullfs source, but I am desperately
> lost. I would love to be able to find out who would be willing to help out
> with questions. I feel I would be spamming far too many people by just sending
> to -hackers.
Mig
On Wed, 28 Jul 1999, Matthew Dillon wrote:
> Ouch. I don't think anyone understands the VOP stuff completely. It's
> a big mess -- which is why it's going to be rewritten later this year.
>
> Your best bet is to study the implementation of the UFS/FFS filesystem.
well, i'd do v9
:I am wading through the portalfs and nullfs source, but I am desperately
:lost. I would love to be able to find out who would be willing to help out
:with questions. I feel I would be spamming far too many people by just sending
:to -hackers. Some of the topics I am curious about are general f
I am wading through the portalfs and nullfs source, but I am desperately
lost. I would love to be able to find out who would be willing to help out
with questions. I feel I would be spamming far too many people by just sending
to -hackers. Some of the topics I am curious about are general fs-st
28 matches
Mail list logo
