On Wed, Mar 31, 2004 at 09:32:11AM -0700, M. Warner Losh wrote:
> : I agree that it's bad to yank a device from under ugen automatically and
> : reattach it to a better match.
>
> I think it is good. Really. However, ugen should mark the device
> busy when it is opened, and mark it as unbusy as
: I agree that it's bad to yank a device from under ugen automatically and
: reattach it to a better match.
I think it is good. Really. However, ugen should mark the device
busy when it is opened, and mark it as unbusy as closed and the
reprobe shouldn't happen if the device is busy. Otherwise,
> On Tue, Mar 30, 2004 at 01:46:32AM -0700, M. Warner Losh wrote:
>> In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Bernd Walter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> : On Mon, Mar 29, 2004 at 07:44:34PM -0700, M. Warner Losh wrote:
>> : > In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> : > Sam Lawrance
>>
On Tue, Mar 30, 2004 at 01:46:32AM -0700, M. Warner Losh wrote:
> In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Bernd Walter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> : On Mon, Mar 29, 2004 at 07:44:34PM -0700, M. Warner Losh wrote:
> : > In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> : > Sam Lawrance <[EMAIL P
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Bernd Walter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
: On Mon, Mar 29, 2004 at 07:44:34PM -0700, M. Warner Losh wrote:
: > In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
: > Sam Lawrance <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
: > : On Sun, 2004-03-28 at 20:47, Bernd Walter wrote:
On Mon, Mar 29, 2004 at 07:44:34PM -0700, M. Warner Losh wrote:
> In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sam Lawrance <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> : On Sun, 2004-03-28 at 20:47, Bernd Walter wrote:
> : > On Sun, Mar 28, 2004 at 01:31:03AM -0700, M. Warner Losh wrote:
> : > > Btw, any intere
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sam Lawrance <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
: On Sun, 2004-03-28 at 20:47, Bernd Walter wrote:
: > On Sun, Mar 28, 2004 at 01:31:03AM -0700, M. Warner Losh wrote:
: > > Btw, any interest in making it possible to kldload a usb module and
: > > having device a
On Sun, 2004-03-28 at 20:47, Bernd Walter wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 28, 2004 at 01:31:03AM -0700, M. Warner Losh wrote:
> > Btw, any interest in making it possible to kldload a usb module and
> > having device attach to it? Right now the usb code assumes that you
> > can unplug the device and replug it
On Sun, Mar 28, 2004 at 01:31:03AM -0700, M. Warner Losh wrote:
> In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Bernd Walter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> : On Sat, Mar 27, 2004 at 04:55:56PM -0700, M. Warner Losh wrote:
> : > In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> : > Bernd Walter <[EMAIL P
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Bernd Walter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
: On Sat, Mar 27, 2004 at 04:55:56PM -0700, M. Warner Losh wrote:
: > In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
: > Bernd Walter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
: > : I'm working on getting devd(8) usable for usb dev
On Sat, Mar 27, 2004 at 04:55:56PM -0700, M. Warner Losh wrote:
> In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Bernd Walter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> : I'm working on getting devd(8) usable for usb devices.
>
> The part I'm not sure about is where you add the pnpinfo to the
> devaddq stuff.
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Bernd Walter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
: I'm working on getting devd(8) usable for usb devices.
The part I'm not sure about is where you add the pnpinfo to the
devaddq stuff. All that stuff should generally be in devaddq. Why
did you did it the way y
On Fri, Mar 26, 2004 at 10:27:39AM +1100, Sam Lawrance wrote:
> Hi,
>
> usbd's present behaviour when reading usbd.conf is to scan from top to
> bottom and use the first match.
>
> What if it was changed to use the last, most specific match? That is,
> the last match with the most of (product, ve
Hi,
usbd's present behaviour when reading usbd.conf is to scan from top to
bottom and use the first match.
What if it was changed to use the last, most specific match? That is,
the last match with the most of (product, vendor) specified.
The idea is that it makes it programmatically easy to add
14 matches
Mail list logo
