Re: thr_sleep() and thr_wakeup()

2000-12-01 Thread Jake Burkholder
> On Friday, December 01, 2000, John Baldwin wrote: > > Can we kill these syscalls? They are not used anywhere in the kernel and > > although they have wrapper functions in libc, no header contains prototypes for > > these wrappers. According to the CVS log they were originally brought in for >

Re: thr_sleep() and thr_wakeup()

2000-12-01 Thread Chris Costello
On Friday, December 01, 2000, John Baldwin wrote: > Can we kill these syscalls? They are not used anywhere in the kernel and > although they have wrapper functions in libc, no header contains prototypes for > these wrappers. According to the CVS log they were originally brought in for > POSIX th

Re: thr_sleep() and thr_wakeup()

2000-12-01 Thread Jake Burkholder
> Can we kill these syscalls? They are not used anywhere in the kernel and > although they have wrapper functions in libc, no header contains prototypes for > these wrappers. According to the CVS log they were originally brought in for > POSIX threads and AIO, neither of which use this facility.

thr_sleep() and thr_wakeup()

2000-12-01 Thread John Baldwin
Can we kill these syscalls? They are not used anywhere in the kernel and although they have wrapper functions in libc, no header contains prototypes for these wrappers. According to the CVS log they were originally brought in for POSIX threads and AIO, neither of which use this facility. Commen