* John-Mark Gurney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [040822 00:18] wrote:
> Alfred Perlstein wrote this message on Sat, Aug 21, 2004 at 23:47 -0700:
> >
> > I have a sysctl node that takes a struct like so:
> >
> > struct mysysctldata {
> > (data here)
> > struct moredata * vc_ptr;
> > size_t len v
Alfred Perlstein wrote this message on Sat, Aug 21, 2004 at 23:47 -0700:
> * Poul-Henning Kamp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [040821 13:29] wrote:
> > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Alfred Perlstein writes:
> > >I'm doing some work that requires that I have a sysctl structure
> > >be passed around, but insi
* Poul-Henning Kamp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [040821 13:29] wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Alfred Perlstein writes:
> >I'm doing some work that requires that I have a sysctl structure
> >be passed around, but inside that structure are several pointers I
> >may need to dereference.
> >
> >Basic
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Alfred Perlstein writes:
>I'm doing some work that requires that I have a sysctl structure
>be passed around, but inside that structure are several pointers I
>may need to dereference.
>
>Basically:
>
>struct mysysctldata {
> (data here)
> void *moredata;
>
I'm doing some work that requires that I have a sysctl structure
be passed around, but inside that structure are several pointers I
may need to dereference.
Basically:
struct mysysctldata {
(data here)
void *moredata;
size_t morelen;
};
What is the proper way of sysctl'ing IN the d
5 matches
Mail list logo
