Re: svn rev. number

2008-10-01 Thread Artis Caune
> small catch, i'm using svk, but i guess I'll look into current's newvers.sh. > and running -stable. > >> If that's the case, newvers.sh will add the output of it to uname: >> >> "FreeBSD fbsd8 8.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 8.0-CURRENT #4 r180876:183019M:..." How about $FreeBSD$ svn tag. Some binaries incl

Re: svn rev. number

2008-10-01 Thread Danny Braniss
> On Wednesday 01 October 2008 14:04:20 Danny Braniss wrote: > > Hi, > > Now that freebsd is under svn, I decided to try what I failed > > with cvs, and actually using svn/svk/svnsync I have a mirror and a local > > branch in sync! > > Since the date reported by uname is not that relevant, is i

Re: svn rev. number

2008-10-01 Thread Max Laier
On Wednesday 01 October 2008 14:04:20 Danny Braniss wrote: > Hi, > Now that freebsd is under svn, I decided to try what I failed > with cvs, and actually using svn/svk/svnsync I have a mirror and a local > branch in sync! > Since the date reported by uname is not that relevant, is it possible

Re: svn rev. number

2008-10-01 Thread Rui Paulo
On 1 Oct 2008, at 13:04, Danny Braniss wrote: Hi, Now that freebsd is under svn, I decided to try what I failed with cvs, and actually using svn/svk/svnsync I have a mirror and a local branch in sync! Since the date reported by uname is not that relevant, is it possible to add the

svn rev. number

2008-10-01 Thread Danny Braniss
Hi, Now that freebsd is under svn, I decided to try what I failed with cvs, and actually using svn/svk/svnsync I have a mirror and a local branch in sync! Since the date reported by uname is not that relevant, is it possible to add the svn-revision # ala build-...? This could make finding p