Re: superpages and kmem on amd64

2012-05-20 Thread Marko Zec
On Monday 21 May 2012 01:12:01 Alan Cox wrote: ... > >>> BTW, apparently malloc(size, M_TEMP, M_NOWAIT) requests fail for size> > >>> 1G, even at boot time. Any ideas how to circumvent that (8.3-STABLE, > >>> amd64, 4G physical RAM)? > >> > >> I suspect that you need to increase the size of your k

Re: superpages and kmem on amd64

2012-05-20 Thread Alan Cox
On 05/20/2012 17:48, Marko Zec wrote: On Sunday 20 May 2012 19:34:26 Alan Cox wrote: ... In any case, I wish to be certain that a particular kmem virtual address range is mapped to superpages - how can I enforce that at malloc time, and / or find out later if I really got my kmem mapped to super

Re: superpages and kmem on amd64

2012-05-20 Thread Marko Zec
On Sunday 20 May 2012 19:34:26 Alan Cox wrote: ... > > In any case, I wish to be certain that a particular kmem virtual address > > range is mapped to superpages - how can I enforce that at malloc time, > > and / or find out later if I really got my kmem mapped to superpages? > > Perhaps vm_map_lo

Re: superpages and kmem on amd64

2012-05-20 Thread User Wojtek
vm.pmap.pde.demotions: 31 No, your conclusion is incorrect. These counts show that 543 superpage mappings were created by promotion. OK, that sounds promising. Does "created by promotion" count reflect historic / cumulative stats, or is vm.pmap.pde.promotions the actual number of superpages

Re: superpages and kmem on amd64

2012-05-20 Thread User Wojtek
historic / cumulative stats, or is vm.pmap.pde.promotions the actual number of superpages active? Or should we subtract vm.pmap.pde.demotions from it to get the current value? yes substracting gives current value. ___ freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org maili

Re: superpages and kmem on amd64

2012-05-20 Thread Alan Cox
On 05/20/2012 09:43, Marko Zec wrote: On Sunday 20 May 2012 09:25:59 Alan Cox wrote: On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 2:01 AM, Marko Zec wrote: Hi all, I'm playing with an algorithm which makes use of large contiguous blocks of kernel memory (ranging from 1M to 1G in size), so it would be nice if thos

Re: superpages and kmem on amd64

2012-05-20 Thread Marko Zec
On Sunday 20 May 2012 09:25:59 Alan Cox wrote: > On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 2:01 AM, Marko Zec wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > I'm playing with an algorithm which makes use of large contiguous blocks > > of kernel memory (ranging from 1M to 1G in size), so it would be nice if > > those could be somehow fo

Re: superpages and kmem on amd64

2012-05-20 Thread Alan Cox
On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 2:01 AM, Marko Zec wrote: > Hi all, > > I'm playing with an algorithm which makes use of large contiguous blocks of > kernel memory (ranging from 1M to 1G in size), so it would be nice if those > could be somehow forcibly mapped to superpages. I was hoping that the VM > s

superpages and kmem on amd64

2012-05-20 Thread Marko Zec
Hi all, I'm playing with an algorithm which makes use of large contiguous blocks of kernel memory (ranging from 1M to 1G in size), so it would be nice if those could be somehow forcibly mapped to superpages. I was hoping that the VM system would automagically map (merge) contiguous 4k pages to