Re: southbridge recognition

2010-03-10 Thread Andriy Gapon
on 09/03/2010 23:20 vol...@vwsoft.com said the following: > Hi! > > For some driver enhancements, I need to decide (by code) which > southbridge (Intel, AMD is all that matters) the driver is facing. > > What's the best (portable wise) way to distinguish the chipset? > > Intel supports two pages

Re: southbridge recognition

2010-03-10 Thread Andriy Gapon
on 10/03/2010 00:02 Ryan Stone said the following: > Can you look at the device/vendor IDs of pci device 0:31:0? That's > always worked for me, but I've only ever done it on Intel platforms so > I'm not sure if it works on AMD chipsets. I think that better yet is to examine vendor of device 0:0:0

Re: southbridge recognition

2010-03-09 Thread Ryan Stone
Can you look at the device/vendor IDs of pci device 0:31:0? That's always worked for me, but I've only ever done it on Intel platforms so I'm not sure if it works on AMD chipsets. ___ freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mail

southbridge recognition

2010-03-09 Thread volker
Hi! For some driver enhancements, I need to decide (by code) which southbridge (Intel, AMD is all that matters) the driver is facing. What's the best (portable wise) way to distinguish the chipset? Intel supports two pages of 128 byte CMOS RAM, AMD supports 1 page of 256 byte (addressing is diff