Marc Slemko wrote:
>
> In any case, it makes sense, and is a reasonable alternative.
> Unfortunately it isn't portable, but that's life.
And linux /proc is portable?
--
Daniel C. Sobral(8-DCS)
d...@newsguy.com
d...@freebsd.org
"If at first you don't succeed, sky
On Tue, 18 May 1999, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
[...]
> unf!
>
> part of a multithreaded ident server that i got bored with...
> i'm not entirely sure it still works:
Yea, that idea works, thanks. I didn't notice that the way this is done
was changed in 3.x to add the sysctl option. I do wonde
On Mon, 17 May 1999, Marc Slemko wrote:
> The premise: libkvm is fatally flawed by design, and fixing it is not an
> easy proposition.
>
> The reasoning: reading from kernel data structures without any locking has
> obvious race conditions.
>
> This is why any identd that uses libkvm sucks and
3 matches
Mail list logo
