on 13/04/2009 18:51 Andriy Gapon said the following:
> on 13/04/2009 18:48 Sean Bruno said the following:
>> The "self-test" never goes beyond "90%" complete?
>
> Yes, exactly. Even for the short one, which is supposed to complete in 1
> minute:
Another data point.
This disk was in an experimenta
on 13/04/2009 18:48 Sean Bruno said the following:
> On Mon, 2009-04-13 at 10:06 +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote:
>> Smart self test never completing.
>
> The "self-test" never goes beyond "90%" complete?
Yes, exactly. Even for the short one, which is supposed to complete in 1 minute:
$ smartctl -t sh
On Mon, 2009-04-13 at 10:06 +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> Smart self test never completing.
The "self-test" never goes beyond "90%" complete?
Sean
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To
on 12/04/2009 22:02 Sean Bruno said the following:
> On Thu, 2009-04-09 at 16:24 +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote:
>> I wonder if anybody has an issue like I do:
>> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.utilities.smartmontools/6354
>>
>> Does anybody has guesses/clues about what might be happening?
>>
>
>
On Thu, 2009-04-09 at 16:24 +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> I wonder if anybody has an issue like I do:
> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.utilities.smartmontools/6354
>
> Does anybody has guesses/clues about what might be happening?
>
I couldn't see anything specifically wrong with the output.
I wonder if anybody has an issue like I do:
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.utilities.smartmontools/6354
Does anybody has guesses/clues about what might be happening?
--
Andriy Gapon
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebs
6 matches
Mail list logo
