Re: sendto() giving EPERM outside a jail

2007-03-28 Thread Daniel O'Connor
On Wednesday 28 March 2007 10:54, Steve Watt wrote: > } I guess it would be nice if the man page(s) mentioned that a firewall > could } cause EPERM. I have seen it before with other apps but the sendto() > confused } me. > > It's one of those unpleasant interactions between pluggable subsystems, >

Re: sendto() giving EPERM outside a jail

2007-03-27 Thread Steve Watt
On Mar 28, 10:23, "Daniel O'Connor" wrote: } Subject: Re: sendto() giving EPERM outside a jail } } On Saturday 24 March 2007 02:47, Steve Watt wrote: } > >According to my reading of the man page it is not possible to get this } > > error unless I'm using ja

Re: sendto() giving EPERM outside a jail

2007-03-27 Thread Daniel O'Connor
On Saturday 24 March 2007 02:47, Steve Watt wrote: > >According to my reading of the man page it is not possible to get this > > error unless I'm using jails (which I'm not). The code in question does.. > That's probably a buglet in the man page. I guess it would be nice if the man page(s) mention

Re: sendto() giving EPERM outside a jail

2007-03-23 Thread Steve Watt
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Daniel O'Connor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Hi, >I am trying to port miniupnpd (http://miniupnp.tuxfamily.org/) and by in large >it seems to work fine (evil idea as it is :) However it spews out a lot of.. >miniupnpd[13010]: sendto(udp_notify): Operation not permitted > >Ac

Re: sendto() giving EPERM outside a jail

2007-03-22 Thread Steve Watt
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Daniel O'Connor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >Hi, >I am trying to port miniupnpd (http://miniupnp.tuxfamily.org/) and by in large >it seems to work fine (evil idea as it is :) However it spews out a lot of.. >miniupnpd[13010]: sendto(udp_notify): Operation not permi

Re: sendto() giving EPERM outside a jail

2007-03-22 Thread Daniel O'Connor
On Thursday 22 March 2007 12:13, Julian Elischer wrote: > > According to my reading of the man page it is not possible to get this > > error unless I'm using jails (which I'm not). The code in question does.. > > you can get it from the firewall too.. Ahah, I guess my firewall rules aren't doing

Re: sendto() giving EPERM outside a jail

2007-03-21 Thread Julian Elischer
Daniel O'Connor wrote: Hi, I am trying to port miniupnpd (http://miniupnp.tuxfamily.org/) and by in large it seems to work fine (evil idea as it is :) However it spews out a lot of.. miniupnpd[13010]: sendto(udp_notify): Operation not permitted According to my reading of the man page it is not

sendto() giving EPERM outside a jail

2007-03-21 Thread Daniel O'Connor
Hi, I am trying to port miniupnpd (http://miniupnp.tuxfamily.org/) and by in large it seems to work fine (evil idea as it is :) However it spews out a lot of.. miniupnpd[13010]: sendto(udp_notify): Operation not permitted According to my reading of the man page it is not possible to get this erro