On Thu, Aug 16, 2001 at 09:42:58AM -0600, Charles Randall wrote:
>
> Also note that the version available in ports/packages for FreeBSD 4.x is
> CFS v1.4.0b2. CFS v1.4.1 is available on Matt Blaze's site.
There's an open PR on this. If you want 1.4.1, apply the patch in the
PR at http://www.Free
lto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2001 3:19 AM
To: Josef Karthauser
Cc: Vladimir Terziev; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: secure Filesystem
Josef Karthauser wrote:
> >Does FreeBSD support any type of secure (encrypted) filesystem?
>
> Look at /usr/ports/security/cfs.
On Thu, Aug 16, 2001 at 10:18:58AM +0100, Konstantin Chuguev wrote:
>
> I'd say, it's a daemon pretending to be an NFS server. It's running
> locally on port other than NFS.
>
> Very nice implementation, I use it a lot. A small problem with it is
> that it seems to support 7-bit file names only.
On Fri, Aug 24, 2001 at 09:34:51AM +0100, Konstantin Chuguev wrote:
> That's cool! Maybe we can have a patch changing these cpp vars in the cfs
> port?
Don't forget to submit any work to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the b
That's cool! Maybe we can have a patch changing these cpp vars in the cfs
port?
Regards,
Konstantin.
Darryl Okahata wrote:
> However, upon perusing the code again, cfsd appears to be using a
> plain hash table with 1024 buckets and a linked list at each bucket.
> The number of buckets
A while back, Alfred Perlstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > However, on a somewhat aging 128MB laptop, a 200+MB cfsd puts the
> > system into swap h*ll pretty quickly. I think cfsd has some linked
> > lists which thrash a lot of pages.
>
> That's unfortunate. Good thing is that cfs is o
Oscar Bonilla <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > A bigger problem is that doing anything with a file uses up 1-2KB
> > PER FILE. If you want to see cfsd grow *really big*, do a "find ." of
> > any large cfs-controlled hierarchy with lots of files. I'd really like
> > to put my MH mail messages
On Thu, Aug 16, 2001 at 12:48:59PM -0700, Darryl Okahata wrote:
> A bigger problem is that doing anything with a file uses up 1-2KB
> PER FILE. If you want to see cfsd grow *really big*, do a "find ." of
> any large cfs-controlled hierarchy with lots of files. I'd really like
> to put my MH
Mike Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The memory is not freed until you unmount (and then, the memory is
> > only free'd for use by other cfs mounts -- the process size does not, of
> > course, shrink).
>
> It doesn't? Does it just use malloc for these structs? When you say "of
> cou
> The memory is not freed until you unmount (and then, the memory is
> only free'd for use by other cfs mounts -- the process size does not, of
> course, shrink).
It doesn't? Does it just use malloc for these structs? When you say "of
course", you kinda imply you're thinking of the "bad o
* Darryl Okahata <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010816 15:49] wrote:
> Alfred Perlstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > A bigger problem is that doing anything with a file uses up 1-2KB
> > > PER FILE. If you want to see cfsd grow *really big*, do a "find ." of
> > > any large cfs-controlled hiera
Alfred Perlstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > A bigger problem is that doing anything with a file uses up 1-2KB
> > PER FILE. If you want to see cfsd grow *really big*, do a "find ." of
> > any large cfs-controlled hierarchy with lots of files. I'd really like
> > to put my MH mail messa
* Darryl Okahata <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010816 14:49] wrote:
> Konstantin Chuguev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > Look at /usr/ports/security/cfs. It's a useland crypto-filesystem that
> > > runs over NFS.
> >
> > I'd say, it's a daemon pretending to be an NFS server. It's running locally
> >
Konstantin Chuguev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Look at /usr/ports/security/cfs. It's a useland crypto-filesystem that
> > runs over NFS.
>
> I'd say, it's a daemon pretending to be an NFS server. It's running locally
> on port other than NFS.
>
> Very nice implementation, I use it a lot. A
Josef Karthauser wrote:
> >Does FreeBSD support any type of secure (encrypted) filesystem?
>
> Look at /usr/ports/security/cfs. It's a useland crypto-filesystem that
> runs over NFS.
>
I'd say, it's a daemon pretending to be an NFS server. It's running locally
on port other than NFS.
Very
On Thu, Aug 16, 2001 at 12:09:44PM +0300, Vladimir Terziev wrote:
>
>Hi hackers,
>
>I have the following question:
>
>Does FreeBSD support any type of secure (encrypted) filesystem?
>
>regards,
>
> Vladimir
Look at /usr/ports/security/cfs. It's a useland crypto-filesys
Hi hackers,
I have the following question:
Does FreeBSD support any type of secure (encrypted) filesystem?
regards,
Vladimir
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
17 matches
Mail list logo
