--- John Baldwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thursday 12 January 2006 06:19 am, kamal kc
> wrote:
> > --- kamal kc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > Queue a task to a taskqueue. Behind the
> scenes
> > >
> > > that
> > >
> > > > will invoke a swi_add if
> > > > you use the taskqueue_swi qu
On Thursday 12 January 2006 06:19 am, kamal kc wrote:
> --- kamal kc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Queue a task to a taskqueue. Behind the scenes
> >
> > that
> >
> > > will invoke a swi_add if
> > > you use the taskqueue_swi queue. However, given
> > > that you want to do some
> > > rather co
--- kamal kc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Queue a task to a taskqueue. Behind the scenes
> that
> > will invoke a swi_add if
> > you use the taskqueue_swi queue. However, given
> > that you want to do some
> > rather complicated work, you'd be better off
> > creating a dedicated taskq
--- John Baldwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > the man page discussed the swi_add() and
> swi_sched()
> > functions.
> >
> > what i don't understand is, how do i register my
> > handler
> > function ??
> > if i use the swi_add() for that purpose what
> > do i use for the void *arg argument.
> >
--- John Baldwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > the man page discussed the swi_add() and
> swi_sched()
> > functions.
> >
> > what i don't understand is, how do i register my
> > handler
> > function ??
> > if i use the swi_add() for that purpose what
> > do i use for the void *arg argument.
On Wednesday 11 January 2006 07:13 am, kamal kc wrote:
> dear everybody,
>
> i had previous thread going on about the cpu load
> average. and had some discussion regarding it. i have
> a newer thing to discuss on so i started this thread.
>
> as i mentioned earlier i had put some code in the
> brid
2006/1/11, kamal kc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> dear everybody,
>
> i had previous thread going on about the cpu load
> average. and had some discussion regarding it. i have
> a newer thing to discuss on so i started this thread.
>
> as i mentioned earlier i had put some code in the
> bridge.c
> that
dear everybody,
i had previous thread going on about the cpu load
average. and had some discussion regarding it. i have
a newer thing to discuss on so i started this thread.
as i mentioned earlier i had put some code in the
bridge.c
that performed compression which took a long time and
hence
i
8 matches
Mail list logo