# [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2003-02-09 17:29:57 -0500:
> On Sunday, February 9, 2003, at 05:12 PM, Roman Neuhauser wrote:
>
> ># [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2003-02-03 13:20:04 +0100:
> >>Sergey Babkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >>>Also the GNU grep has a lot more options, the most interesting
> >>>of them b
On Sunday, February 9, 2003, at 05:12 PM, Roman Neuhauser wrote:
# [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2003-02-03 13:20:04 +0100:
Sergey Babkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Also the GNU grep has a lot more options, the most interesting
of them being -r.
Unfortunately, GNU grep's -r option is broken (it does n
# [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2003-02-03 13:20:04 +0100:
> Sergey Babkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Also the GNU grep has a lot more options, the most interesting
> > of them being -r.
>
> Unfortunately, GNU grep's -r option is broken (it does not handle
> symnlinks correctly). Try textproc/freegrep
On Mon, Feb 03, 2003 at 11:39:47PM -0500, Munish Chopra wrote:
> On 2003-02-03 18:51 +, Lyndon Nerenberg wrote:
> > >The classic Unix including BSD4.4 UNIX is now under a
> > >BSD-like license too (finding it is another issue
> > >though ;).
> >
> > Kirk McKusick sells a CD-ROM collection cont
On 2003-02-03 18:51 +, Lyndon Nerenberg wrote:
> >The classic Unix including BSD4.4 UNIX is now under a
> >BSD-like license too (finding it is another issue
> >though ;).
>
> Kirk McKusick sells a CD-ROM collection containing all the CSRG
> distributions:
>
> https://www.mckusick.com/cs
>The classic Unix including BSD4.4 UNIX is now under a
>BSD-like license too (finding it is another issue
>though ;).
Kirk McKusick sells a CD-ROM collection containing all the CSRG
distributions:
https://www.mckusick.com/csrg/
Pretty much everything that had to be GNUified in BSD/386 an
The classic Unix including BSD4.4 UNIX is now under a
BSD-like license too (finding it is another issue
though ;). Anyone from those days remembers anything
that might be worth resurrecting?
cheers,
Pedro.
--- "James P. Howard II" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ha
scritto: > Pedro F. Giffuni said:
> >
That's very cool! Congratulations!
NetBSD has a BSD sort, I understand it's based on the
Minix version, so we are getting very near to cleaning
all the utilities from the GPL.
cheers,
Pedro.
--- "James P. Howard II" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ha
scritto: > Dag-Erling Smorgrav said:
> > Sergey Ba
Sergey Babkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Also the GNU grep has a lot more options, the most interesting
> of them being -r.
Unfortunately, GNU grep's -r option is broken (it does not handle
symnlinks correctly). Try textproc/freegrep from ports instead.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PR
"Pedro F. Giffuni" wrote:
>
> FWIW;
>
> The UNIX grep executable is like >3 times smaller than
> GNU grep but also like 3 times slower.
I think that it's said in GNU grep readme: they have knowingly
chosen a faster but more memory-consuming algorithm. And I think
that they've done similar choice
FWIW;
The UNIX grep executable is like >3 times smaller than
GNU grep but also like 3 times slower.
Also .. JIC you wonder, I only built this for
curiosity, I recommend keeping GNU grep unless Caldera
changes the license :).
Pedro.
___
Hi guys;
I replaced GNU grep with SCO's grep from
http://unixtools.sourceforge.net . They are both
covered by the same license (GPL) so there might not
be any real advantage in the replacement. I haven't
compared performance either.
Compiling was trivial, I only had to cut and paste one
function
12 matches
Mail list logo
