Re: rcp -x

2000-09-15 Thread Robert Watson
On Thu, 14 Sep 2000, Steve Ames wrote: > Thanks for the explanation. That wasn't clear from the manpage. SSH > sounds like the better path for me. As was also pointed out in a private e-mail, this probably ought to be cleaned up so that either (a) a different man page is installed for the non-c

Re: rcp -x

2000-09-14 Thread Steve Ames
en't installed. > > (example w/o kerberos installed) > > rcp -x > rcp: illegal option -- x > usage: rcp [-p] f1 f2 >rcp [-pr] f1 ... fn directory > > (example w/kerberos installed) > > rcp -x > usage: rcp [-Kpx] [-k realm] f1 f2 >rcp [-Kp

Re: rcp -x

2000-09-13 Thread Robert Watson
The -x options on rsh, rcp, and rlogin rely on Kerberos support, which it appears you haven't installed. (example w/o kerberos installed) > rcp -x rcp: illegal option -- x usage: rcp [-p] f1 f2 rcp [-pr] f1 ... fn directory (example w/kerberos installed) > rcp -x usage: rcp

rcp -x

2000-09-13 Thread Steven E. Ames
The man page for rcp(1) lists a '-x' option: -x Turn on DES encryption for all data passed by rcp. This may im- pact response time and CPU utilization, but provides increased security. But the command line doesn't seem to honor it? winr