On Fri, 31 Aug 2007, Sean Bruno wrote:
Doug Barton wrote:
Assuming that lack of an affirmative _enable variable is a constant, the
only way that a service can be started is with either onestart or
forcestart. The symmetry here would be to stop it the same way.
This may be symmetrical, but I
On Fri, 31 Aug 2007, Erik Trulsson wrote:
The times I have noticed that stop does not work without an _enable variable
has been when I wished to stop running some service. First I edited rc.conf
to remove the _enable line (to make sure the service did not start the next
time I restarted the com
On Friday 31 August 2007 18:51:23 Sean Bruno wrote:
> Tobias Roth wrote:
> > Sean Bruno wrote:
> >> I noticed that if rc.conf has ntpd_enable="NO", an invocation of
> >> /etc/rc.d/ntpd stop won't actually shut down ntpd. I checked a
> >> couple of other processes(like net-snmp) and noted the same
On Fri, Aug 31, 2007 at 10:09:52AM -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
> On Fri, 31 Aug 2007, Sean Bruno wrote:
>
>> I noticed that if rc.conf has ntpd_enable="NO", an invocation of
>> /etc/rc.d/ntpd stop won't actually shut down ntpd. I checked a couple of
>> other processes(like net-snmp) and noted the
Doug Barton wrote:
On Fri, 31 Aug 2007, Sean Bruno wrote:
I noticed that if rc.conf has ntpd_enable="NO", an invocation of
/etc/rc.d/ntpd stop won't actually shut down ntpd. I checked a
couple of other processes(like net-snmp) and noted the same behavior.
FYI, there is a list for discussing
Sean Bruno wrote:
> I noticed that if rc.conf has ntpd_enable="NO", an invocation of
> /etc/rc.d/ntpd stop won't actually shut down ntpd. I checked a couple
> of other processes(like net-snmp) and noted the same behavior.
>
> I would have expected that rc would be able to invoke the stop routines
Sean Bruno wrote:
> Tobias Roth wrote:
>> Sean Bruno wrote:
>>
>>> I noticed that if rc.conf has ntpd_enable="NO", an invocation of
>>> /etc/rc.d/ntpd stop won't actually shut down ntpd. I checked a couple
>>> of other processes(like net-snmp) and noted the same behavior.
>>>
>>> I would have ex
On Fri, 31 Aug 2007, Sean Bruno wrote:
I noticed that if rc.conf has ntpd_enable="NO", an invocation of
/etc/rc.d/ntpd stop won't actually shut down ntpd. I checked a couple of
other processes(like net-snmp) and noted the same behavior.
FYI, there is a list for discussing rc.d issues, [EMAIL
Tobias Roth wrote:
Sean Bruno wrote:
I noticed that if rc.conf has ntpd_enable="NO", an invocation of
/etc/rc.d/ntpd stop won't actually shut down ntpd. I checked a couple
of other processes(like net-snmp) and noted the same behavior.
I would have expected that rc would be able to invoke th
I noticed that if rc.conf has ntpd_enable="NO", an invocation of
/etc/rc.d/ntpd stop won't actually shut down ntpd. I checked a couple
of other processes(like net-snmp) and noted the same behavior.
I would have expected that rc would be able to invoke the stop routines
if a utility is disable
10 matches
Mail list logo
