On Sun, 13 Jul 2008, Bruce Cran wrote:
BC> > PJ> On 2008-Jul-04 13:01:11 +0400, Dmitry Morozovsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
BC> > PJ> wrote:
BC> > PJ> >It seems we step on a bug in gcc in RELENG_7/i386
BC> > PJ> >
BC> > PJ> >It is triggered at least by profiling program which uses
BC> > PJ> >getopt(3):
On Sun, 13 Jul 2008 18:01:12 +0400 (MSD)
Dmitry Morozovsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, 13 Jul 2008, Peter Jeremy wrote:
>
> PJ> On 2008-Jul-04 13:01:11 +0400, Dmitry Morozovsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> PJ> wrote:
> PJ> >It seems we step on a bug in gcc in RELENG_7/i386
> PJ> >
> PJ> >It is
On Sun, 13 Jul 2008, Peter Jeremy wrote:
PJ> On 2008-Jul-04 13:01:11 +0400, Dmitry Morozovsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
PJ> >It seems we step on a bug in gcc in RELENG_7/i386
PJ> >
PJ> >It is triggered at least by profiling program which uses getopt(3):
PJ>
PJ> I think it's actually in the profi
On 2008-Jul-04 13:01:11 +0400, Dmitry Morozovsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>It seems we step on a bug in gcc in RELENG_7/i386
>
>It is triggered at least by profiling program which uses getopt(3):
I think it's actually in the profiling initialisation code. If
you try to run sample code under gdb
On Fri, 4 Jul 2008, Dmitry Morozovsky wrote:
DM> It seems we step on a bug in gcc in RELENG_7/i386
DM>
DM> It is triggered at least by profiling program which uses getopt(3):
[snip]
DM> other ref platforms seem to be ok.
Nah, HEAD/i386 also has this bug, though backtrace is a bit different:
Dear colleagues,
It seems we step on a bug in gcc in RELENG_7/i386
It is triggered at least by profiling program which uses getopt(3):
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/tmp/gprof> cat test.c
#include
int
main(int argc, char *argv[])
{
int ch;
while ((ch = getopt(argc, argv, "")) != -1) {
6 matches
Mail list logo
