Re: problems with the integrated tcp-wrappers.

[ Hijacked from freebsd-hackers ] On Tue, 20 Jul 1999 17:33:24 CST, Greg Skafte wrote: > I've just recently switched from using the tcpwrappers port to the > native tcpwrappers implemention > > the following config entries worked on the port but are not working with > the native I've tested t

Re: problems with the integrated tcp-wrappers.

[ Hijacked from freebsd-hackers ] On Tue, 20 Jul 1999 17:33:24 CST, Greg Skafte wrote: > I've just recently switched from using the tcpwrappers port to the > native tcpwrappers implemention > > the following config entries worked on the port but are not working with > the native I've tested

Re: problems with the integrated tcp-wrappers.

On Tue, 20 Jul 1999 17:33:24 CST, Greg Skafte wrote: > I've just recently switched from using the tcpwrappers port to the > native tcpwrappers implemention I really shouldn't be answering, since you've mailed the wrong mailing list, but I can't resist. :-) > the following config entries worke

Re: problems with the integrated tcp-wrappers.

On Tue, 20 Jul 1999 17:33:24 CST, Greg Skafte wrote: > I've just recently switched from using the tcpwrappers port to the > native tcpwrappers implemention I really shouldn't be answering, since you've mailed the wrong mailing list, but I can't resist. :-) > the following config entries work

problems with the integrated tcp-wrappers.

I've just recently switched from using the tcpwrappers port to the native tcpwrappers implemention the following config entries worked on the port but are not working with the native teln...@xxx.yyy.84.2 ftpd rlog...@xxx.yyy.84.2 r...@xxx.yyy.84.2 nta...@xxx.yyy.84.2 :\ KNOWN :\

problems with the integrated tcp-wrappers.

I've just recently switched from using the tcpwrappers port to the native tcpwrappers implemention the following config entries worked on the port but are not working with the native [EMAIL PROTECTED] ftpd [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] :\ KNOWN :\ rfc93