On Thu, 6 Feb 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I looked at the code of if_ep.c and I see that the continue is indeed
> not there.
AFAIK it needs to be there; at least it solves the hangs I see here.
Dw
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the bo
Dear All,
>
> : --- if_ep.c Fri Feb 1 19:51:43 2002
> : +++ if_ep.c.fix Sat Feb 9 12:49:31 2002
> : @@ -571,7 +571,6 @@
> :
> : if (status & (S_RX_COMPLETE | S_RX_EARLY)) {
> : epread(sc);
> : - continue;
> : }
> : if (status & S_TX_AVAIL) {
>
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Jonathan Hanna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
:
: This looks like the bug in the "ep" driver. When the interrupt routine
: gets both TX and RX interrupts it acknowledges both but only services
: the read. Karl Dietz, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> is working on an ov
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Jonathan Hanna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
: From my look at the driver the issues I know of are the interrupt
: problem as above and a lack of splx(x) if sc->gone in
: ep_intr(). From Karl: possible impending merge with the "vx" driver.
That's right.
User Seva wrote:
> I commented out "continue" in if_ep.c.
> There is no any "No buffer space available" any more.
If you are missing it, then you can set up a PPP connection,
and then unplug your modem and start a "ping".
(it's still a routing problem).
-- Terry
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [E
On 11-Feb-02 M. Warner Losh wrote:
> In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Mike Silbersack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>:
>: On Sat, 9 Feb 2002, Jonathan Hanna wrote:
>:
>: >
>: > This looks like the bug in the "ep" driver. When the interrupt routine
>: > gets both TX and RX interrupts
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mike Silbersack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
: Ah, good. I wasn't sure that any committers still used those cards.
You'd be surprised how many cards I have...
Warner
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in
On Sun, 10 Feb 2002, M. Warner Losh wrote:
> : If this fix is solid, should it be applied now to the ep driver? Should
> : we wait until the driver merge is complete? I don't own any cards that
> : use the ep chipset, but if that change fixes bugs for multiple ep users I
> : wouldn't be oppose
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mike Silbersack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
:
: On Sat, 9 Feb 2002, Jonathan Hanna wrote:
:
: >
: > This looks like the bug in the "ep" driver. When the interrupt routine
: > gets both TX and RX interrupts it acknowledges both but only services
: > the
On Sat, 9 Feb 2002, Jonathan Hanna wrote:
>
> This looks like the bug in the "ep" driver. When the interrupt routine
> gets both TX and RX interrupts it acknowledges both but only services
> the read. Karl Dietz, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> is working on an overhaul
> but my quick fix is to take out the
Thanks!
I commented out "continue" in if_ep.c.
There is no any "No buffer space available" any more.
Seva.
Jonathan Hanna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> This looks like the bug in the "ep" driver. When the interrupt routine
> gets both TX and RX interrupts it acknowledges both but only servic
continue;
}
if (status & S_TX_AVAIL) {
/* we need ACK */
Karl Dietz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On 09-Feb-02 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Some times connections to my host freeze.
> What buffer ping talks about?
>
> ~:# ping p109
> ping: sendto: No buf
Jain
AiNET
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, February 09, 2002 2:58 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: ping: sendto: No buffer space available
Some times connections to my host freeze.
What buffer ping talks
Some times connections to my host freeze.
What buffer ping talks about?
~:# ping p109
ping: sendto: No buffer space available
ping: sendto: No buffer space available
ping: sendto: No buffer space available
ping: sendto: No buffer space available
PING p109.f434.n5020.z2.fidonet.org
14 matches
Mail list logo
