Re: patches for 4.x devrandom so that bind "works"

2000-11-14 Thread Mark Murray
> > Yes, it is this simple :-). > > Can you get it ready for 4.2? I'd like to see us be able to > run bind9 in the next release. Sure. I'll see if I can do it in the next couple of hours. M -- Mark Murray Join the anti-SPAM movement: http://www.cauce.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL P

Re: patches for 4.x devrandom so that bind "works"

2000-11-13 Thread Alfred Perlstein
* Mark Murray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [001113 22:17] wrote: > > I was playing with bind9 and got the typical: > > > > On FreeBSD systems, the server logs error messages like "fcntl(8, > > F_SETFL, 4): Inappropriate ioctl for device". This is due to > > a bug in the FreeSBD /dev/random dev

Re: patches for 4.x devrandom so that bind "works"

2000-11-13 Thread Mark Murray
Hi I have something similar to this, and it goes slightly further. Yes, it is this simple :-). M > I was playing with bind9 and got the typical: > > On FreeBSD systems, the server logs error messages like "fcntl(8, > F_SETFL, 4): Inappropriate ioctl for device". This is due to > a

patches for 4.x devrandom so that bind "works"

2000-11-13 Thread Alfred Perlstein
I was playing with bind9 and got the typical: On FreeBSD systems, the server logs error messages like "fcntl(8, F_SETFL, 4): Inappropriate ioctl for device". This is due to a bug in the FreeSBD /dev/random device. The bug has been reported to the FreeBSD maintainers. Versions of O