On Wed, Dec 17, 2003 at 01:09:18PM -0500, Ted Unangst wrote:
> while on the subject, there's a piece of code something like this in
> freebsd:
> /*
> * We hash the name and then some other bit of data that is
> * invariant over the dirhash's lifetime. Otherwise names
>
while on the subject, there's a piece of code something like this in
freebsd:
/*
* We hash the name and then some other bit of data that is
* invariant over the dirhash's lifetime. Otherwise names
* differing only in the last byte are placed close to one
* a
On Wed, 17 Dec 2003, Robert Watson wrote:
> On Wed, 17 Dec 2003, Alexander Kabaev wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 16 Dec 2003 22:12:08 -0500 (EST)
> > Ted Unangst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > can somebody please review/commit this to freebsd? it is most of the
> > > differences to permit openbsd
On Wed, 17 Dec 2003, Alexander Kabaev wrote:
> On Tue, 16 Dec 2003 22:12:08 -0500 (EST)
> Ted Unangst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > can somebody please review/commit this to freebsd? it is most of the
> > differences to permit openbsd to use the code. it should not change
> > the code in a
On Tue, 16 Dec 2003 22:12:08 -0500 (EST)
Ted Unangst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> can somebody please review/commit this to freebsd? it is most of the
> differences to permit openbsd to use the code. it should not change
> the code in any functional way.
I do not think there is any point in th
can somebody please review/commit this to freebsd? it is most of the
differences to permit openbsd to use the code. it should not change the
code in any functional way.
Index: ufs_dirhash.c
===
RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/sys/ufs/uf
6 matches
Mail list logo