You are absolutely right, that `inline' shouldn't have been there. My bad.
It works now - thanks!
John
On Sat, 10 Feb 2001 15:51:35 -0800 (PST), Jean-Marc Zucconi wrote:
> > John Wilson writes:
>
> > -
> > my_new.cc
> > -
>
> > #include
> > #include
>
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> John Wilson writes:
: inline void *operator new(size_t size)
This causes no code to be generated. Remove inline.
Warner
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> John Wilson writes:
: but gcc (g++) doesn't seem to want to link them in, and uses its own
: __builtin_new and __builtin_delete instead.
we do this all the time.
g++ foo.o -o foo -pthreads -static
works great. You must use g++ and not gcc to like, or you
> John Wilson writes:
> -
> my_new.cc
> -
> #include
> #include
> #include "my_new.h"
> inline void *operator new(size_t size)
> {
> printf("my new was called with size = %u\n", size);
> return malloc(size);
> }
This is stupid. Inline function
Thanks for your reply, Jordan. -fno-builtin doesn't seem to work.
Consider the following simple scenario:
my_new.h
#include
inline void *operator new(size_t size);
-
my_new.cc
-
#include
#include
#include "my_new.h"
inline void *operator new(size_t s
> but gcc (g++) doesn't seem to want to link them in, and uses its own
> __builtin_new and __builtin_delete instead.
You need to compile everything with -fno-builtin so that g++ won't
try to use its own versions but yours instead.
- Jordan
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "u
Hello, fellow hackers,
I have written my own little memory management system optimized for the
needs of a multi-threaded server written in C++.I have defined my own
inline void* operator new(size_t size)
and
inline void operator delete(void *ptr)
but gcc (g++) doesn't seem to want to link
7 matches
Mail list logo
