Re: natd bug

2001-01-07 Thread Gordon Tetlow
Scratch that, I still get the error messages. For some reason they didn't show up for an hour or two. They usually show up immediately. -gordon On Sat, 6 Jan 2001, Gordon Tetlow wrote: > I used to get this exact same message, although my natd setup worked just > fine. It was just filling up the

Re: natd bug

2001-01-06 Thread Gordon Tetlow
I used to get this exact same message, although my natd setup worked just fine. It was just filling up the logs. I then added -log_denied to the arguements for natd and it stopped spewing log messages. Here's what I run: /sbin/natd -unregistered_only -use_sockets -punch_fw 5050:10 -log_denied -n

Re: natd bug

2000-12-04 Thread Gordon Tetlow
It didn't seem to help for me. I still get lots of permission denied, but then again, I'm also using a much stricter set of rules. I seriously hope that the fact we are using 3com etherlink iii cards doesn't have anything to do with it. Just to note. As far as I can tell, it's still doing nat ju

Re: natd bug

2000-12-04 Thread Charles Anderson
rguments I pass to natd: > > /sbin/natd -dynamic -unregistered_only -use_sockets -punch_fw 3850:10 -n vx0 > > On Thu, 30 Nov 2000, Frederik Meerwaldt wrote: > > > Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2000 20:25:15 +0100 (CET) > > From: Frederik Meerwaldt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > T

Re: natd bug

2000-12-02 Thread Gordon Tetlow
/natd -dynamic -unregistered_only -use_sockets -punch_fw 3850:10 -n vx0 On Thu, 30 Nov 2000, Frederik Meerwaldt wrote: > Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2000 20:25:15 +0100 (CET) > From: Frederik Meerwaldt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: natd bug > > Hi there! >

Re: natd bug

2000-12-02 Thread Frederik Meerwaldt
Hi! > Is your link up at that time? The usual setup for a sppp device using dynamic > ip's is an invalid ip (0.0.0.0) that is changed once an ip was assigned. So, if > you are not dialled in, the invalid ip will be put in by natd, and that usually > causes this error message. I want the link to

Re: natd bug

2000-12-01 Thread Thomas Moestl
On Thu, Nov 30, 2000 at 08:25:15PM +0100, Frederik Meerwaldt wrote: > I compiled my kernel with IPDIVERT IPFIREWALL and > IPFIREWALL_DEFAULT_TO_ACCEPT and I set up only one rule: > ipfw add divert natd all from any to any via isp0 > Then I started natd (at boot time): > natd -unregistered_only -dy

Re: natd bug

2000-12-01 Thread Frederik Meerwaldt
Hi! > # ipfw add divert natd all from any to any via isp0 I have exactly this line in my config (see my original posting) Best Regards, Freddy -- Geek Code 3.1: GCS s+: a--- C+++ UBOU+++ P-- E--- W++ N w--- V++ PGP- t? 5? tv ===

Re: natd bug

2000-12-01 Thread Rink Springer
t;[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2000 8:25 PM Subject: natd bug > Hi there! > > I was just looking why my natd doesnt work, when I discovered the > following bug (?): > > I compiled my kernel with IPDIVERT IPFIREWALL and > IPFIREWALL

natd bug

2000-12-01 Thread Frederik Meerwaldt
Hi there! I was just looking why my natd doesnt work, when I discovered the following bug (?): I compiled my kernel with IPDIVERT IPFIREWALL and IPFIREWALL_DEFAULT_TO_ACCEPT and I set up only one rule: ipfw add divert natd all from any to any via isp0 Then I started natd (at boot time): natd -un

Re: natd bug with pptp, hack fix, question

2000-09-27 Thread Ruslan Ermilov
On Wed, Sep 27, 2000 at 12:34:36AM -0400, David G. Andersen wrote: > With natd+ipfw, I was setting up a front-end firewall for > a client. The firewall has several real IP addresses > (we'll call them 10.0.0.1 and 10.0.0.2) and two > MS PPTP servers behind it. > > > 10.0.0.1 >

natd bug with pptp, hack fix, question

2000-09-26 Thread David G. Andersen
With natd+ipfw, I was setting up a front-end firewall for a client. The firewall has several real IP addresses (we'll call them 10.0.0.1 and 10.0.0.2) and two MS PPTP servers behind it. 10.0.0.1 10.0.0.2 World- | firewall | - PPTP-1 192.168.1.1

NATD-Bug???

2000-07-07 Thread Frederik Meerwaldt
Hi all, I've configured my Server as a router, so when I'm online, I automatically start natd, to let my other computers use my server as a gateway. But thw problem is, that NATD dies after about 10 Minutes. The process is still there, but I can't route anymore. After flushing all rules and start