Re: multi-link 802.11b through netgraph yields poor performance.

Sorry to cross post this, I want it in the archives. [discussion on using mulitilink acrsss wireless cards deleted] I have done similar, using two IP channels and with mpd as the "one2many" basically, assign real IP addresses to the 4 cards, on 2 separate 10.x.x.x/30 networks then open ksock

Re: multi-link 802.11b through netgraph yields poor performance.

> Also, before blaming netgraph, which may well be to blame, could it be > that you have interference from some other source that's making things > bad? The exactly every other packet being dropped does seem to be a > big clue. I have ruled out interference as a contributor to these results. M

Re: multi-link 802.11b through netgraph yields poor performance.

In message: John Kozubik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: ... : laptops. Both are 4.5-RELEASE, one has two aironet LMC352 cards, and one : has two Lucent gold cards. ... : packet is dropped. Further, echo response time is between 2.2 and 2.5

Re: multi-link 802.11b through netgraph yields poor performance.

John Kozubik wrote: > Julian, Archie, et al, > > I have experimented with a multi-link 802.11b connection between two > laptops. Both are 4.5-RELEASE, one has two aironet LMC352 cards, and > one has two Lucent gold cards. > > I have successfully used ng_one2many, etc., to establish a working > mu

multi-link 802.11b through netgraph yields poor performance.

Julian, Archie, et al, I have experimented with a multi-link 802.11b connection between two laptops. Both are 4.5-RELEASE, one has two aironet LMC352 cards, and one has two Lucent gold cards. I have successfully used ng_one2many, etc., to establish a working multi-link between the two systems