Re: ls -l | more inverts colour

On Fri, 1 Sep 2000, Josef Karthauser wrote: > It sounds like 'more' is the culprit, not 'ls'. > > Joe FWIW, I've seen the inverted color problem a few times since less replaced more, but haven't taken the effort to figure out when exactly it's happening. Ironically, it seems more likely to ha

Re: ls -l | more inverts colour

On Fri, Sep 01, 2000 at 08:48:56AM +0100, Theo PAGTZIS wrote: > Josef Karthauser wrote: > > > You're not using the flags for colourized ls are you? > > > > If you do: > > > > % ls > /tmp/ls > > % cat /tmp/ls | more > > > > Does it still leave the screen inverted? > > > > Joe > > > > Joe, > > As

Re: ls -l | more inverts colour

Josef Karthauser wrote: > You're not using the flags for colourized ls are you? > > If you do: > > % ls > /tmp/ls > % cat /tmp/ls | more > > Does it still leave the screen inverted? > > Joe > Joe, As in the first place, on the first screen it does not get the screen inverted but on the second

Re: ls -l | more inverts colour

You're not using the flags for colourized ls are you? If you do: % ls > /tmp/ls % cat /tmp/ls | more Does it still leave the screen inverted? Joe On Thu, Aug 31, 2000 at 05:59:35PM +0100, Theo PAGTZIS wrote: > > uname ... > > FreeBSD olympos.cs.ucl.ac.uk 4.1-RELEASE FreeBSD 4.1-RELEASE #1:

Re: ls -l | more inverts colour

On Thu, Aug 31, 2000 at 08:45:17AM +0100, Theo PAGTZIS wrote: > Hi All, > > for some strange reason an ls -l | more inverts the colour on an > xterm. If I vi a file then colour comes back to normal (I gather vi > resets xterm) > > Is that known? What versions are you running? Please send the

ls -l | more inverts colour

Hi All, for some strange reason an ls -l | more inverts the colour on an xterm. If I vi a file then colour comes back to normal (I gather vi resets xterm) Is that known? Theo To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message