Kip Macy wrote:
Do you have a set of regression tests for libev? It sounds like they
would worth having to regression test kqueue.
I would have thought that libevent and libev should both the checked
against kqueue. Also APR
and everything else that has support. I'm not the author of libev
On Dec 17, 2007 1:25 PM, James Mansion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Kip Macy wrote:
> >> he's just plain misinforme
> > Until we know what he is referring to we can't actually say that.
> > -Kip
> >
>
> OK he said I could post from our private email so here goes. There were
> bits in and around r
Kip Macy wrote:
he's just plain misinforme
Until we know what he is referring to we can't actually say that.
-Kip
OK he said I could post from our private email so here goes. There were
bits in and around relating to the
Solaris /dev/poll support (and the mechanism's limitations) which I
Julian Elischer wrote:
> Julian Elischer wrote:
> > James Mansion wrote:
> >> [ On the libev being unhappy with kqueue ]
> >> ...
> >> It looks like a decent library, but these comments seem
> unfortunate.
> >> Does anyone know what the author is concerned about?
> >
> > he's just plain misinform
On Dec 15, 2007, at 08:47 , Kip Macy wrote:
On 12/15/07, James Mansion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Any idea what the author of libev is on about here (from
http://pod.tst.eu/http://cvs.schmorp.de/libev/ev.pod):
unsigned int ev_recommended_backends ()
Return the set of all backends compiled
> > It looks like a decent library, but these comments seem unfortunate.
> > Does anyone know what the author is concerned about?
>
> he's just plain misinformed
>
Until we know what he is referring to we can't actually say that.
-Kip
___
freebsd-hacker
Julian Elischer wrote:
James Mansion wrote:
Any idea what the author of libev is on about here (from
http://pod.tst.eu/http://cvs.schmorp.de/libev/ev.pod):
unsigned int ev_recommended_backends ()
Return the set of all backends compiled into this binary of libev
and also recommended for
James Mansion wrote:
Any idea what the author of libev is on about here (from
http://pod.tst.eu/http://cvs.schmorp.de/libev/ev.pod):
unsigned int ev_recommended_backends ()
Return the set of all backends compiled into this binary of libev
and also recommended for this platform. This set
Actually, until recently it was broken on pipes. We've never received
any PRs to that effect so there is no way of knowing. You'll have
better luck asking the author himself.
-Kip
On 12/15/07, James Mansion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Any idea what the author of libev is on about here (from
On Sat, Dec 15, 2007 at 09:51:20AM +, James Mansion wrote:
>Kqueue deserves special mention, as at the time of this writing, it
>was broken on all BSDs except NetBSD (usually it doesn't work with
>anything but sockets and pipes, except on Darwin, where of course
>its completely
On 15/12/2007, James Mansion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> |EVBACKEND_KQUEUE| (value 8, most BSD clones)
> Kqueue deserves special mention, as at the time of this writing, it
> was broken on all BSDs except NetBSD (usually it doesn't work with
> anything but sockets and pipes, except on
Any idea what the author of libev is on about here (from
http://pod.tst.eu/http://cvs.schmorp.de/libev/ev.pod):
unsigned int ev_recommended_backends ()
Return the set of all backends compiled into this binary of libev
and also recommended for this platform. This set is often smaller
th
12 matches
Mail list logo
