On Tue, 17 Oct 2006, Cheng-Lung Sung wrote:
On Mon, Oct 16, 2006 at 02:31:24PM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
Is this better?
...
Thanks, I didn't go through the whole sem.h.
Also, it seems we should put these parts before 'sturct semid_ds'.
or say, after we include sys/ipc.h (which inclu
[This is still being sent to too many mailing lists since I don't know
which ones it should go to except gnats.]
On Mon, 16 Oct 2006, John Baldwin wrote:
Including sys/types.h would add lots of namespace pollution which
sys/ipc.h and sys/sem.h are trying hard to avoid. sem.h is trying too
ha
On Mon, Oct 16, 2006 at 02:31:24PM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
> On Sunday 15 October 2006 11:21, Bruce Evans wrote:
> > On Sun, 15 Oct 2006, Cheng-Lung Sung wrote:
> >
> > > System: FreeBSD.csie.nctu.edu.tw 6.1-STABLE FreeBSD 6.1-STABLE #9: Thu
> > > May
> 11 14:31:45 CST 2006
> [EMAIL PROT
On Sunday 15 October 2006 11:21, Bruce Evans wrote:
> On Sun, 15 Oct 2006, Cheng-Lung Sung wrote:
>
> > System: FreeBSD.csie.nctu.edu.tw 6.1-STABLE FreeBSD 6.1-STABLE #9: Thu May
11 14:31:45 CST 2006
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/home/usr.obj/usr/src/sys/FREEBSD i386
> >
> >> Description:
> > - sys/se
On Mon, Oct 16, 2006 at 01:21:59AM +1000, Bruce Evans wrote:
> On Sun, 15 Oct 2006, Cheng-Lung Sung wrote:
>
> >System: FreeBSD.csie.nctu.edu.tw 6.1-STABLE FreeBSD 6.1-STABLE #9: Thu May
> >11 14:31:45 CST 2006
> >[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/home/usr.obj/usr/src/sys/FREEBSD i386
> >
> >>Description:
On Sun, 15 Oct 2006, Cheng-Lung Sung wrote:
System: FreeBSD.csie.nctu.edu.tw 6.1-STABLE FreeBSD 6.1-STABLE #9: Thu May 11
14:31:45 CST 2006 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/home/usr.obj/usr/src/sys/FREEBSD i386
Description:
- sys/sem.h has included sys/ipc.h, which includes sys/_types.h
but it (and
6 matches
Mail list logo