On Sun, Nov 30, 2003 at 06:53:10AM -, Antti Louko wrote:
> Generally, I like the (Free)BSD way of doing things. But the IP
> filtering modules available for FreeBSD lack one feature when compared
> to Linux way (ipchains and iptables).
There is no "call" instruction by design in ipfw2. The re
Antti Louko wrote:
Generally, I like the (Free)BSD way of doing things. But the IP
filtering modules available for FreeBSD lack one feature when compared
to Linux way (ipchains and iptables).
In ipchains and iptables you have a sequential list of rules, very
much like in ipfw and ipf, but you can
You should be able to accomplish the same -- although in a more convoluted
way -- with ipf[w]. You might want to use a higher-level tool though instead
of writing all the rules by hand. Try using fwbuilder or code your own ab-
straction which translates to ipfw rules.
ipfw for example
In local.freebsd-hackers, you wrote:
> In ipchains and iptables you have a sequential list of rules, very
> much like in ipfw and ipf, but you can have several different lists
> which have symbolic names and you can make calls from lists to other
> lists based on normal packet criteria. If the lis
Generally, I like the (Free)BSD way of doing things. But the IP
filtering modules available for FreeBSD lack one feature when compared
to Linux way (ipchains and iptables).
In ipchains and iptables you have a sequential list of rules, very
much like in ipfw and ipf, but you can have several diffe
5 matches
Mail list logo
