On Thu, 3 Oct 2002, Leo Bicknell wrote:
>In a message written on Thu, Oct 03, 2002 at 12:55:15PM -0700, Crist J. Clark wrote:
>> This is a feature not a bug since it is documented in inet_aton(3),
>>
>> All numbers supplied as ``parts'' in a `.' notati
In a message written on Fri, Oct 04, 2002 at 11:19:16AM +0930, Daniel O'Connor wrote:
> I would imagine this behaviour is like it is because that is how atoi
> and friends work..
Absolutely. I think this is the unintended consequence sort of
bug, not the programmer goofed sort of bug. :) I'd de
On Fri, 2002-10-04 at 11:08, Leo Bicknell wrote:
> 0xff00 was hex,
> 0123456701234567 was octal,
> 010.010.010.010 was 4 decimal parts
>
> I was very surprised from the poster that 192.168.0.010 might actually
> be 192.168.0.8.
I would imagine this behaviour is like it is because that
In a message written on Thu, Oct 03, 2002 at 12:55:15PM -0700, Crist J. Clark wrote:
> This is a feature not a bug since it is documented in inet_aton(3),
>
> All numbers supplied as ``parts'' in a `.' notation may be decimal,
> octal, or hexadecimal, as
ome investigation I found that both ping and arp use
> inet_aton() libc call to interpret their command arguments
> into networkformat.Futher,inet_aton()uses
> strtoul(c,&endptr, 0) for each octet in IP address to
> convert string representation of number t
that both ping and arp use
inet_aton() libc call to interpret their command arguments
intonetworkformat.Futher,inet_aton()uses
strtoul(c,&endptr, 0) for each octet in IP address to
convert string representation of number to unsigned long.
Why not to use strtoul(x, x
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Julian
Elischer writes:
: hmm I thought it was you doing an in-kernel proxy?
: ah no wait it was an in-kernel server?
: (wasn't it?)
Neither. You have me confused with someone else.
Warner
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-
hmm I thought it was you doing an in-kernel proxy?
ah no wait it was an in-kernel server?
(wasn't it?)
On Tue, 31 Jul 2001, Warner Losh wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Julian
>Elischer writes:
> : I think Warner Losh may have already done this
>
> I don't think I've done this.
>
>
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Julian
Elischer writes:
: I think Warner Losh may have already done this
I don't think I've done this.
Warner
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
I think Warner Losh may have already done this
On Tue, 31 Jul 2001, Anjali Kulkarni wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Thanks for your response.
> The reason I am trying to use inet_aton is because I am writing a kernel
> proxy which connects to a webserver etc. etc.
> So, I need to conve
nel which has a remote server's ip-address string, and I need to connect
> to the remote server, so I need to use inet_aton.
In general, string manipulation in the kernel is a bad idea.
The problem is that C strings are subject to buffer overflows,
etc., and dragging them into the
;s ip-address string, and I need to connect
to the remote server, so I need to use inet_aton.
Anjali
- Original Message -
From: Terry Lambert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Anjali Kulkarni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, July 29, 2001 2:21 AM
Hi,
Thanks for your response.
The reason I am trying to use inet_aton is because I am writing a kernel
proxy which connects to a webserver etc. etc.
So, I need to convert the server's ip address to the network byte address,
and hence I need to use this function. I do not see how else I ca
Mike Smith wrote:
>
> > I want to use the function inet_aton() in the kernel code. However, I =
> > found no kernel equivalent of this function int the freebsd sources. I =
> > could find inet_ntoa(), but not inet_aton(). Is it named by some other =
> > name or how c
> Anjali Kulkarni wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I want to use the function inet_aton() in the kernel code.
> However, I found no kernel equivalent of this function int
> the freebsd sources. I could find inet_ntoa(), but not
> inet_aton(). Is it named by some other name or how
> I want to use the function inet_aton() in the kernel code. However, I =
> found no kernel equivalent of this function int the freebsd sources. I =
> could find inet_ntoa(), but not inet_aton(). Is it named by some other =
> name or how can I locate it?
If you are trying to pa
Hi,
I want to use the function inet_aton() in the
kernel code. However, I found no kernel equivalent of this function int the
freebsd sources. I could find inet_ntoa(), but not inet_aton(). Is it named by
some other name or how can I locate it?
Thanks,
Anjali
17 matches
Mail list logo
