Re: inconsistency in /usr/bin/make

2002-10-14 Thread Roman Neuhauser
# [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2002-10-14 16:09:47 +0300: > On Mon, Oct 14, 2002 at 02:14:23PM +0200, Roman Neuhauser wrote: > > # [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2002-10-14 14:36:22 +0300: > > > On Mon, Oct 14, 2002 at 11:57:18AM +0200, Roman Neuhauser wrote: > > > > In any event, could someone point me to a place in

Re: inconsistency in /usr/bin/make

2002-10-14 Thread Ruslan Ermilov
On Mon, Oct 14, 2002 at 02:14:23PM +0200, Roman Neuhauser wrote: > # [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2002-10-14 14:36:22 +0300: > > On Mon, Oct 14, 2002 at 11:57:18AM +0200, Roman Neuhauser wrote: > > > In any event, could someone point me to a place in the make(1) man page > > > where it says that the S and

Re: inconsistency in /usr/bin/make

2002-10-14 Thread Roman Neuhauser
# [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2002-10-14 14:36:22 +0300: > On Mon, Oct 14, 2002 at 11:57:18AM +0200, Roman Neuhauser wrote: > > In any event, could someone point me to a place in the make(1) man page > > where it says that the S and C modifiers dereference variables given in > > both the pattern and repla

Re: inconsistency in /usr/bin/make

2002-10-14 Thread Ruslan Ermilov
On Mon, Oct 14, 2002 at 11:57:18AM +0200, Roman Neuhauser wrote: > Hi there, > > continuing my make adventure, I've stumbled across the following > inconsistency. I would even call it a bug. > > In any event, could someone point me to a place in the make(1) man page > where it says that the S an

inconsistency in /usr/bin/make

2002-10-14 Thread Roman Neuhauser
Hi there, continuing my make adventure, I've stumbled across the following inconsistency. I would even call it a bug. In any event, could someone point me to a place in the make(1) man page where it says that the S and C modifiers dereference variables given in both the pattern and replacement,