Re: gzipped crashdumps

2001-09-04 Thread Michael Sinz
John Polstra wrote: > > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Anyone else think this patch from NetBSD is worthwhile? > > Yes yes yes yes yes! That's 5 votes in favor of it already. :-) Add in another 50 here (the number of machines here that produ

Re: gzipped crashdumps

2001-09-03 Thread David O'Brien
On Mon, Sep 03, 2001 at 02:04:08PM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Sun, Sep 02, 2001 at 10:22:14AM -0700, David O'Brien wrote: > > > > --- /dev/null Sat Sep 1 01:13:34 2001 > > > +++ zopen.c Sat Sep 1 01:10:14 2001 > > > @@ -0,0 +1,39 @@ > > > +/* > > > + * Public domain stdio wrappe

Re: gzipped crashdumps

2001-09-03 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Sun, Sep 02, 2001 at 10:22:14AM -0700, David O'Brien wrote: > > --- /dev/null Sat Sep 1 01:13:34 2001 > > +++ zopen.c Sat Sep 1 01:10:14 2001 > > @@ -0,0 +1,39 @@ > > +/* > > + * Public domain stdio wrapper for libz, written by Johan Danielsson. > > + */ > > Can we add this to libz or

Re: gzipped crashdumps

2001-09-02 Thread David O'Brien
On Sat, Sep 01, 2001 at 01:16:31AM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote: > Anyone else think this patch from NetBSD is worthwhile? As JDP said, "YES!". > --- /dev/null Sat Sep 1 01:13:34 2001 > +++ zopen.c Sat Sep 1 01:10:14 2001 > @@ -0,0 +1,39 @@ > +/* > + * Public domain stdio wrapper for libz, wr

Re: gzipped crashdumps

2001-09-01 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Sat, Sep 01, 2001 at 12:29:18PM -0700, John Polstra wrote: > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Anyone else think this patch from NetBSD is worthwhile? > > Yes yes yes yes yes! That's 5 votes in favor of it already. :-) :-) > > Should I also

Re: gzipped crashdumps

2001-09-01 Thread John Polstra
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Anyone else think this patch from NetBSD is worthwhile? Yes yes yes yes yes! That's 5 votes in favor of it already. :-) > Should I also extend it to support bzip2'ed dumps now that that's in > the base system, or wou

gzipped crashdumps

2001-09-01 Thread Kris Kennaway
Anyone else think this patch from NetBSD is worthwhile? Should I also extend it to support bzip2'ed dumps now that that's in the base system, or would that be overkill? Kris Index: Makefile === RCS file: /mnt/ncvs/src/sbin/savecore