Re: gcc question

On 2005-02-25 11:34, Kathy Quinlan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Daniel O'Connor wrote: >>On Thu, 24 Feb 2005 17:57, Kathy Quinlan wrote: >>> ATM it is written in codevisionAVR which is where the function is >>> called, so I guess for now I will just break the AVR support;) >> >> Ahh.. >> So.. are yo

Re: gcc question

Daniel O'Connor wrote: On Thu, 24 Feb 2005 17:57, Kathy Quinlan wrote: ATM it is written in codevisionAVR which is where the function is called, so I guess for now I will just break the AVR support;) Ahh.. So.. are you talking about getting the coding running _in FreeBSD_ or compiled on FreeBSD a

Re: gcc question

On Thu, 24 Feb 2005 17:57, Kathy Quinlan wrote: > ATM it is written in codevisionAVR which is where the function is > called, so I guess for now I will just break the AVR support;) Ahh.. So.. are you talking about getting the coding running _in FreeBSD_ or compiled on FreeBSD and running on an AV

Re: gcc question

Daniel O'Connor wrote: On Thu, 24 Feb 2005 15:00, Kathy Quinlan wrote: I have some code that I build for two targets, one an Atmel uC and the other FreeBSD. What is the best way to redefine getchar and putchar (in uC they use the serial port, in FreeBSD stdin stdout) Or would I be better #ifdef the

Re: gcc question

On Thu, 24 Feb 2005 15:00, Kathy Quinlan wrote: > I have some code that I build for two targets, one an Atmel uC and the > other FreeBSD. > > What is the best way to redefine getchar and putchar (in uC they use the > serial port, in FreeBSD stdin stdout) > > Or would I be better #ifdef the commands

gcc question

Hi all, I have some code that I build for two targets, one an Atmel uC and the other FreeBSD. What is the best way to redefine getchar and putchar (in uC they use the serial port, in FreeBSD stdin stdout) Or would I be better #ifdef the commands and making getchar only used in uC and my serial