At 05:23 PM 04/27/2001, you wrote:
>In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Dennis writes:
> >At 05:51 PM 04/26/2001, Peter Seebach wrote:
> >>(Go ahead, dismiss me as being unfairly biased against C.)
>
> >Done. Like I said, its not worthy of debate.
>
>Wow. I think that pretty much summarizes your know
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Dennis writes:
>At 05:51 PM 04/26/2001, Peter Seebach wrote:
>>(Go ahead, dismiss me as being unfairly biased against C.)
>Done. Like I said, its not worthy of debate.
Wow. I think that pretty much summarizes your knowledge of the situation.
:)
-s
p.s.: If you
At 05:51 PM 04/26/2001, Peter Seebach wrote:
>In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Dennis writes:
> >Don't try to argue this ridiculous point on this list. You are badly
> >overmatched. You are so wrong that its not worthy of debate.
>
>Which is presumably why you offered no arguments.
>
>Actually, thi
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Dennis writes:
>Don't try to argue this ridiculous point on this list. You are badly
>overmatched. You are so wrong that its not worthy of debate.
Which is presumably why you offered no arguments.
Actually, this is a fairly well-demonstrated result. Anything tha
Dennis wrote:
>
> At 09:11 AM 04/26/2001, you wrote:
> >On Thu, Apr 26, 2001 at 11:00:15PM +1000, Greg Black wrote:
> >Nope. The real nonsense is what you say. Perl core is written in a
> >highly optimized C using very polished algorithms. As long as the Perl
> >script is written in such a way
At 09:11 AM 04/26/2001, you wrote:
>On Thu, Apr 26, 2001 at 11:00:15PM +1000, Greg Black wrote:
> > Anton Berezin wrote:
> >
> > | Could you provide the Perl script as well?
> >
> > That would be pointless. The issue is with the C ...
>
>I know that.
>
> > | I am quite sure it can be
> > | made t
On Thu, Apr 26, 2001 at 09:44:36AM -0400, Jason Andresen wrote:
> Er, isn't this the kind of problem the GCC folks are more likly to be
> able to fix?
In general yes. But it doesn't hurt to double check here to make sure
you your ducks in row before going to the GCC lists. I see later in this
t
Jason Andresen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
> > I ran into this bug while analyzing a customer's logs to determine the
> > best time of day for an upgrade. The original script was in Perl, but
> > I rewrote it in C because it was too slow. The C version produces
> > i
Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
>
> I ran into this bug while analyzing a customer's logs to determine the
> best time of day for an upgrade. The original script was in Perl, but
> I rewrote it in C because it was too slow. The C version produces
> incorrect results when compiled with -O. Note that
On Thu, Apr 26, 2001 at 11:00:15PM +1000, Greg Black wrote:
> Anton Berezin wrote:
>
> | Could you provide the Perl script as well?
>
> That would be pointless. The issue is with the C ...
I know that.
> | I am quite sure it can be
> | made to run faster. In fact, it is almost always possib
Anton Berezin wrote:
| Could you provide the Perl script as well?
That would be pointless. The issue is with the C ...
| I am quite sure it can be
| made to run faster. In fact, it is almost always possible in Perl to
| closely match the perfomance of a C program for this kind of
| applicati
Anton Berezin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Could you provide the Perl script as well? I am quite sure it can be
> made to run faster. In fact, it is almost always possible in Perl to
> closely match the perfomance of a C program for this kind of
> application.
I doubt it - and in any case, thi
On Thu, Apr 26, 2001 at 02:23:49PM +0200, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
> I ran into this bug while analyzing a customer's logs to determine the
> best time of day for an upgrade. The original script was in Perl, but
> I rewrote it in C because it was too slow.
Could you provide the Perl script as
I ran into this bug while analyzing a customer's logs to determine the
best time of day for an upgrade. The original script was in Perl, but
I rewrote it in C because it was too slow. The C version produces
incorrect results when compiled with -O. Note that the log starts at
16:27.
The warning
14 matches
Mail list logo
