Re: fxp, xl driver question .. (routing)(SOLVED)

1999-12-06 Thread kvandel
Mike- > I should have summarised this by saying: Correct use of the latency > timer will shorten your DMA bursts for you when necessary, giving you the > best of both worlds. When it's safe to run a long burst, you will. When > you need to push a device off the bus, that will happen too. Af

Re: fxp, xl driver question .. (routing)

1999-12-06 Thread Mike Smith
> > On Sun, 05 Dec 1999, you wrote: > Conversely, you can achieve the same latency reduction by setting the > latency timer to 16, without increasing your overheads there. (This isn't > actually entirely true, as you may run into busmaster ping-pong with more > than one in the system, but you'll g

Re: fxp, xl driver question .. (routing)

1999-12-06 Thread Mike Smith
> On Sun, 05 Dec 1999, you wrote: > > > > > The question: Why doesn't this work... it seem so straight forward... > > > > I'm not sure about the code in question, but the basic assumptions you're > > making about PCI's behaviour are flawed. To achieve the goal you're > > trying to, you need to

Re: fxp, xl driver question .. (routing)

1999-12-05 Thread kvandel
On Sun, 05 Dec 1999, you wrote: > > > The question: Why doesn't this work... it seem so straight forward... > > I'm not sure about the code in question, but the basic assumptions you're > making about PCI's behaviour are flawed. To achieve the goal you're > trying to, you need to reduce the va