Re: fdescfs oddities

2001-02-02 Thread Chris Costello
On Saturday, February 03, 2001, Christian Weisgerber wrote: > While we are talking about fdesc(fs), how does it relate to devfs? > I.e. will devfs make fdesc useless, or require it, or...? I don't really know yet. The reason I did it was to make it the code used by devfs, but I haven't heard

Re: fdescfs oddities

2001-02-02 Thread Christian Weisgerber
Chris Costello <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >I've done some work on fdescfs in -CURRENT a while back [...] While we are talking about fdesc(fs), how does it relate to devfs? I.e. will devfs make fdesc useless, or require it, or...? -- Christian "naddy" Weisgerber [EM

Re: fdescfs oddities

2001-02-01 Thread Chris Costello
On Thursday, February 01, 2001, Maxime Henrion wrote: > I run a 4.2-STABLE machine, world done this morning. I had some troubles with > fdescfs. Reading the fdesc(5) manual page, I have to mount the fdescfs like I > would mount procfs. But if I compile my kernel with options FDESC or if I load > t

fdescfs oddities

2001-02-01 Thread Maxime Henrion
Hi, I run a 4.2-STABLE machine, world done this morning. I had some troubles with fdescfs. Reading the fdesc(5) manual page, I have to mount the fdescfs like I would mount procfs. But if I compile my kernel with options FDESC or if I load the fdesc.ko kernel module, I have access to /dev/