Re: fdescfs brokenness

2009-05-09 Thread Kostik Belousov
On Sat, May 09, 2009 at 01:05:31AM +0200, Jilles Tjoelker wrote: > On Fri, May 08, 2009 at 11:12:03PM +0300, Kostik Belousov wrote: > > On Thu, May 07, 2009 at 08:07:46PM -0700, Tim Kientzle wrote: > > > Colin Percival recently pointed out some issues > > > with tar and fdescfs. Part of the proble

Re: fdescfs brokenness

2009-05-08 Thread Jilles Tjoelker
On Fri, May 08, 2009 at 11:12:03PM +0300, Kostik Belousov wrote: > On Thu, May 07, 2009 at 08:07:46PM -0700, Tim Kientzle wrote: > > Colin Percival recently pointed out some issues > > with tar and fdescfs. Part of the problem > > here is tar; I need to rethink some of the > > traversal logic. >

Re: fdescfs brokenness

2009-05-08 Thread Kostik Belousov
On Thu, May 07, 2009 at 08:07:46PM -0700, Tim Kientzle wrote: > Colin Percival recently pointed out some issues > with tar and fdescfs. Part of the problem > here is tar; I need to rethink some of the > traversal logic. > > But fdescfs is really wonky: > > * This is a nit, but: ls /dev/fd/18 s

fdescfs brokenness

2009-05-07 Thread Tim Kientzle
Colin Percival recently pointed out some issues with tar and fdescfs. Part of the problem here is tar; I need to rethink some of the traversal logic. But fdescfs is really wonky: * This is a nit, but: ls /dev/fd/18 should not return EBADF; it should return ENOENT, just like any other re