On Fri, Jul 23, 1999 at 03:57:19PM +0200, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
> Andre Albsmeier writes:
> > Just to overcome speculations :-) I just tested it on another machine
> > with the same result. If have tested it now between all 3 machines in
> > each direction. Same result.
>
> Weird. I'm unable
On Fri, 23 Jul 1999 14:16:19 +0100, David Malone wrote:
> > But when inetd is run without -l it get 100%.
>
> Interesting - does it still answer requests during this time?
Yeah. What we really need to know is how many packets inetd actually
received.
The manpage excerpt that DES showed us ind
On Fri, 23-Jul-1999 at 14:16:19 +0100, David Malone wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 23, 1999 at 03:06:02PM +0200, Andre Albsmeier wrote:
>
> > It's only nearly 50% because syslogd gets most of the other half :-)
> >
> > But when inetd is run without -l it get 100%.
>
> Interesting - does it still answer re
On Fri, Jul 23, 1999 at 03:57:19PM +0200, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
> Andre Albsmeier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Just to overcome speculations :-) I just tested it on another machine
> > with the same result. If have tested it now between all 3 machines in
> > each direction. Same result.
>
On Fri, Jul 23, 1999 at 03:06:02PM +0200, Andre Albsmeier wrote:
> It's only nearly 50% because syslogd gets most of the other half :-)
>
> But when inetd is run without -l it get 100%.
Interesting - does it still answer requests during this time?
David.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to m
On Fri, 23-Jul-1999 at 13:50:45 +0100, David Malone wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 23, 1999 at 02:29:19PM +0200, Sheldon Hearn wrote:
>
> > Well, you did ask for them (inetd -l). :-)
> >
> > > Jul 23 11:21:28 printfix inetd[1743]: time from [...]
> > > Jul 23 11:21:28 printfix inetd[1743]: daytime from [
On Fri, 23 Jul 1999 13:50:45 +0100, David Malone wrote:
> You could turn on wrapping and log them at a level at which
> syslog will ignore them. I'm not sure how much this would help
> with inetd chewing CPU time, but...
If, indeed, inetd is really "chewing CPU time".
Ciao,
Sheldon.
To Unsub
On Fri, Jul 23, 1999 at 02:29:19PM +0200, Sheldon Hearn wrote:
> Well, you did ask for them (inetd -l). :-)
>
> > Jul 23 11:21:28 printfix inetd[1743]: time from [...]
> > Jul 23 11:21:28 printfix inetd[1743]: daytime from [...]
>
> Usually syslog will give you "last message repeated X times".
On Fri, 23 Jul 1999 14:16:19 +0100, David Malone wrote:
> > But when inetd is run without -l it get 100%.
>
> Interesting - does it still answer requests during this time?
Yeah. What we really need to know is how many packets inetd actually
received.
The manpage excerpt that DES showed us in
On Fri, 23-Jul-1999 at 14:16:19 +0100, David Malone wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 23, 1999 at 03:06:02PM +0200, Andre Albsmeier wrote:
>
> > It's only nearly 50% because syslogd gets most of the other half :-)
> >
> > But when inetd is run without -l it get 100%.
>
> Interesting - does it still answer r
On Fri, Jul 23, 1999 at 03:06:02PM +0200, Andre Albsmeier wrote:
> It's only nearly 50% because syslogd gets most of the other half :-)
>
> But when inetd is run without -l it get 100%.
Interesting - does it still answer requests during this time?
David.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to
On Fri, 23-Jul-1999 at 13:50:45 +0100, David Malone wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 23, 1999 at 02:29:19PM +0200, Sheldon Hearn wrote:
>
> > Well, you did ask for them (inetd -l). :-)
> >
> > > Jul 23 11:21:28 printfix inetd[1743]: time from [...]
> > > Jul 23 11:21:28 printfix inetd[1743]: daytime from
On Fri, 23 Jul 1999 13:50:45 +0100, David Malone wrote:
> You could turn on wrapping and log them at a level at which
> syslog will ignore them. I'm not sure how much this would help
> with inetd chewing CPU time, but...
If, indeed, inetd is really "chewing CPU time".
Ciao,
Sheldon.
To Unsu
On Fri, Jul 23, 1999 at 02:29:19PM +0200, Sheldon Hearn wrote:
> Well, you did ask for them (inetd -l). :-)
>
> > Jul 23 11:21:28 printfix inetd[1743]: time from [...]
> > Jul 23 11:21:28 printfix inetd[1743]: daytime from [...]
>
> Usually syslog will give you "last message repeated X times"
14 matches
Mail list logo
