In message <012801bec4ee$cfb29380$[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "Leif Neland" writes:
: If there was someplace nice to put it:
: ERROR! ^G^G^G^G^GFTP_PASSIVE_MODE must be either "yes" or "no"
I disagree. This breaks the old behavior, while checking explicitly
against no preserves all old behavior, except f
In message <012801bec4ee$cfb29380$0e00a...@neland.dk> "Leif Neland" writes:
: If there was someplace nice to put it:
: ERROR! ^G^G^G^G^GFTP_PASSIVE_MODE must be either "yes" or "no"
I disagree. This breaks the old behavior, while checking explicitly
against no preserves all old behavior, except f
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "David O'Brien" writes:
: So that makes three of us that believe the check should be agaist "no"
: rather than "yes".
(setq check-against-no (+ check-against-no 1))
>From my .cshrc:
...
setenv FTP_PASSIVE_MODE
...
Warner
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PRO
In message <19990702174337.d3...@dragon.nuxi.com> "David O'Brien" writes:
: So that makes three of us that believe the check should be agaist "no"
: rather than "yes".
(setq check-against-no (+ check-against-no 1))
Four. :)
> On Fri, Jul 02, 1999 at 05:15:14PM -0700, Mike Smith wrote:
> > > I have to agree with Eivind, I know of people in my lab that have
> > > FTP_PASSIVE_MODE defined to nosense values since that is all that was
> > > required before. Now what are these poor souls to do when they upgrade
Four. :)
> On Fri, Jul 02, 1999 at 05:15:14PM -0700, Mike Smith wrote:
> > > I have to agree with Eivind, I know of people in my lab that have
> > > FTP_PASSIVE_MODE defined to nosense values since that is all that was
> > > required before. Now what are these poor souls to do when they upgrade
>
- Original Message -
From: David O'Brien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Ruslan Ermilov
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, July 03, 1999 2:15 AM
Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/usr.bin/ftp Makefile fetch.c
- Original Message -
From: David O'Brien
To: Dag-Erling Smorgrav ; Ruslan Ermilov
;
Sent: Saturday, July 03, 1999 2:15 AM
Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/usr.bin/ftp Makefile fetch.c ftp.1 ftp.c
ftp_var.h main.c util.c
> > ... compared to the sources as of today. This gi
On Fri, Jul 02, 1999 at 05:15:14PM -0700, Mike Smith wrote:
> > I have to agree with Eivind, I know of people in my lab that have
> > FTP_PASSIVE_MODE defined to nosense values since that is all that was
> > required before. Now what are these poor souls to do when they upgrade
> > to 3.3-R and t
On Fri, Jul 02, 1999 at 05:15:14PM -0700, Mike Smith wrote:
> > I have to agree with Eivind, I know of people in my lab that have
> > FTP_PASSIVE_MODE defined to nosense values since that is all that was
> > required before. Now what are these poor souls to do when they upgrade
> > to 3.3-R and th
> > ... compared to the sources as of today. This gives minimal semantic
> > difference from the way it worked before the change (which was that if
> > FTP_PASSIVE_MODE existed, ftp used passive mode).
>
> I have to agree with Eivind, I know of people in my lab that have
> FTP_PASSIVE_MODE defin
> > ... compared to the sources as of today. This gives minimal semantic
> > difference from the way it worked before the change (which was that if
> > FTP_PASSIVE_MODE existed, ftp used passive mode).
>
> I have to agree with Eivind, I know of people in my lab that have
> FTP_PASSIVE_MODE define
> ... compared to the sources as of today. This gives minimal semantic
> difference from the way it worked before the change (which was that if
> FTP_PASSIVE_MODE existed, ftp used passive mode).
I have to agree with Eivind, I know of people in my lab that have
FTP_PASSIVE_MODE defined to nosens
> ... compared to the sources as of today. This gives minimal semantic
> difference from the way it worked before the change (which was that if
> FTP_PASSIVE_MODE existed, ftp used passive mode).
I have to agree with Eivind, I know of people in my lab that have
FTP_PASSIVE_MODE defined to nosense
On Thu, Jul 01, 1999 at 03:03:12PM +0200, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
> Ruslan Ermilov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > On Thu, Jul 01, 1999 at 01:51:24PM +0200, Eivind Eklund wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jul 01, 1999 at 04:33:37AM -0700, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
> > > > - separate the pftp and FTP_PASSIVE_M
On Thu, Jul 01, 1999 at 03:03:12PM +0200, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
> Ruslan Ermilov writes:
> > On Thu, Jul 01, 1999 at 01:51:24PM +0200, Eivind Eklund wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jul 01, 1999 at 04:33:37AM -0700, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
> > > > - separate the pftp and FTP_PASSIVE_MODE tests so gate mo
16 matches
Mail list logo
