Re: comments on proposed uthread_write.c changes

2003-09-08 Thread Dan Langille
On 7 Sep 2003 at 19:40, Dan Langille wrote: > On 7 Sep 2003 at 12:32, Daniel Eischen wrote: > > > On Sun, 7 Sep 2003, Dan Langille wrote: > > > > > A problem with pthreads and EOT has been identified. See PR 56274. It > > > was suggested the solution was probably just a matter of changing one

Re: comments on proposed uthread_write.c changes

2003-09-07 Thread Dan Langille
On 7 Sep 2003 at 12:32, Daniel Eischen wrote: > On Sun, 7 Sep 2003, Dan Langille wrote: > > > A problem with pthreads and EOT has been identified. See PR 56274. It > > was suggested the solution was probably just a matter of changing one of > > the >0 tests to >=0 in uthread_write.c > > > > An

Re: comments on proposed uthread_write.c changes

2003-09-07 Thread Daniel Eischen
On Sun, 7 Sep 2003, Dan Langille wrote: > A problem with pthreads and EOT has been identified. See PR 56274. It > was suggested the solution was probably just a matter of changing one of > the >0 tests to >=0 in uthread_write.c > > Any comments on that? I don't know that a return of 0 isn't va

comments on proposed uthread_write.c changes

2003-09-07 Thread Dan Langille
A problem with pthreads and EOT has been identified. See PR 56274. It was suggested the solution was probably just a matter of changing one of the >0 tests to >=0 in uthread_write.c Any comments on that? Here's a diff I came up with after looking at src/lib/libc_r/uthreaduthread_write.c. Any s