Re: changing gzip's symlink handling to be consistent with bzip2, xz and GNU gzip

2010-11-15 Thread Alexander Best
On Mon Nov 15 10, Alexander Best wrote: > On Mon Nov 15 10, Xin LI wrote: > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > > Hash: SHA256 > > > > Hi, > > > > On 11/15/10 10:24, Alexander Best wrote: > > > hi there, > > > > > > any thoughts on this patch? it changes the semantics of gzip so that it is >

Re: changing gzip's symlink handling to be consistent with bzip2, xz and GNU gzip

2010-11-15 Thread Alexander Best
On Mon Nov 15 10, Xin LI wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA256 > > Hi, > > On 11/15/10 10:24, Alexander Best wrote: > > hi there, > > > > any thoughts on this patch? it changes the semantics of gzip so that it is > > consistent with the semantics of bzip2, xz and for more im

Re: changing gzip's symlink handling to be consistent with bzip2, xz and GNU gzip

2010-11-15 Thread Xin LI
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hi, On 11/15/10 10:24, Alexander Best wrote: > hi there, > > any thoughts on this patch? it changes the semantics of gzip so that it is > consistent with the semantics of bzip2, xz and for more important GNU gzip. Could you please elaborate more a

changing gzip's symlink handling to be consistent with bzip2, xz and GNU gzip

2010-11-15 Thread Alexander Best
hi there, any thoughts on this patch? it changes the semantics of gzip so that it is consistent with the semantics of bzip2, xz and for more important GNU gzip. cheers. alex -- a13x diff --git a/usr.bin/gzip/gzip.1 b/usr.bin/gzip/gzip.1 index 848a4b3..8eab82c 100644 --- a/usr.bin/gzip/gzip.1 ++