nd amd64 are sharing the same bootcode the
> > > > bootloader
> > > > gets named
> > > > "FreeBSD/i386" on amd64 too. the following patch is a cosmetic
> > > > change to
> > > have
> > > > the bootloader identify itself as "Free
On Monday 22 March 2010 11:20:10 am Alexander Best wrote:
> John Baldwin schrieb am 2010-03-22:
> > On Monday 22 March 2010 9:50:05 am Alexander Best wrote:
> > > hi there,
>
> > > since i386 and amd64 are sharing the same bootcode the bootloader
> > > gets
John Baldwin schrieb am 2010-03-22:
> On Monday 22 March 2010 9:50:05 am Alexander Best wrote:
> > hi there,
> > since i386 and amd64 are sharing the same bootcode the bootloader
> > gets named
> > "FreeBSD/i386" on amd64 too. the following patch is a
On Monday 22 March 2010 9:50:05 am Alexander Best wrote:
> hi there,
>
> since i386 and amd64 are sharing the same bootcode the bootloader gets named
> "FreeBSD/i386" on amd64 too. the following patch is a cosmetic change to
have
> the bootloader identify itself as
hi there,
since i386 and amd64 are sharing the same bootcode the bootloader gets named
"FreeBSD/i386" on amd64 too. the following patch is a cosmetic change to have
the bootloader identify itself as "FreeBSD/amd64" on amd64.
any thoughts on this one?
--
Alexander Best
--- Thomas Sparrevohn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thursday 28 June 2007 14:44:05 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > --- Thomas Sparrevohn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ha scritto:
> > ...
> >
> > >
> > > I have Vista Home edition ruinning any FreeBSD without any problems and
> > > without having to d
On Thursday 28 June 2007 14:44:05 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> --- Thomas Sparrevohn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ha scritto:
> ...
>
> >
> > I have Vista Home edition ruinning any FreeBSD without any problems and
> > without having to do anything special - That is on CURRENT
> >
> >
> Hmm...
>
> In
--- Thomas Sparrevohn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ha scritto:
...
>
> I have Vista Home edition ruinning any FreeBSD without any problems and
> without having to do anything special - That is on CURRENT
>
>
Hmm...
Installation order is important, perhaps you already had FreeBSD before
installing Vi
On Thursday 28 June 2007 11:33:39 Julian H. Stacey wrote:
> > I have Vista Home edition ruinning any FreeBSD without any problems and
> > without having to do anything special - That is on CURRENT
>
> ruinning: No such word
> ruining: Wrecking, destroying
> running: Working accepta
Ivan Voras wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
FWIW, if you just got your new computer with Windows Vista
installed and were hoping to dual boot FreeBSD on it, let me tell
you that FreeBSD's bootloader will screw things up.
vista doesn't like:
>> - bootloaders different than
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi;
>
> FWIW, if you just got your new computer with Windows Vista installed and were
> hoping to dual boot FreeBSD on it, let me tell you that FreeBSD's bootloader
> will screw things up.
>
> Microsoft basically declared the war on alterna
> I have Vista Home edition ruinning any FreeBSD without any problems and
> without having to do anything special - That is on CURRENT
ruinning: No such word
ruining:Wrecking, destroying
running:Working acceptably - I guess you probably mean this ?
--
Julian Stacey.
On Thursday 28 June 2007 03:08:34 Garrett Cooper wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Hi;
> >
> > FWIW, if you just got your new computer with Windows Vista installed and
> > were
> > hoping to dual boot FreeBSD on it, let me tell you that FreeBSD'
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Hi;
> >
> > FWIW, if you just got your new computer with Windows Vista installed
and were
> > hoping to dual boot FreeBSD on it, let me tell you that FreeBSD's
bootloader
> > will screw things up.
> >
> > Microsoft basi
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi;
FWIW, if you just got your new computer with Windows Vista installed and were
hoping to dual boot FreeBSD on it, let me tell you that FreeBSD's bootloader
will screw things up.
Microsoft basically declared the war on alternative OSs so it seems vista
doesn&#
Hi;
FWIW, if you just got your new computer with Windows Vista installed and were
hoping to dual boot FreeBSD on it, let me tell you that FreeBSD's bootloader
will screw things up.
Microsoft basically declared the war on alternative OSs so it seems vista
doesn't like:
- bootloaders
> From owner-freebsd-sm...@freebsd.org Fri Jul 30 10:45:10 1999
> From: "Nielsen, Roy S"
> To: "'freebsd-sm...@freebsd.org'" ,
> "'freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.org'"
> Subject: bootloader
> Date: Fri, 30 Jul 1999 10:44
> From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jul 30 10:45:10 1999
> From: "Nielsen, Roy S" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> "'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: bootloa
[Cross-posted: replying to -hackers]
> I'm looking at booting(embedded devices) and I've been looking at lilo boot
> loader code and booteasy bootloader code...
>
> does anyone know of any documentation that anyone out there has done on this
> topic? -- more specific
[Cross-posted: replying to -hackers]
> I'm looking at booting(embedded devices) and I've been looking at lilo boot
> loader code and booteasy bootloader code...
>
> does anyone know of any documentation that anyone out there has done on this
> topic? -- more specific
I'm looking at booting(embedded devices) and I've been looking at lilo boot
loader code and booteasy bootloader code...
does anyone know of any documentation that anyone out there has done on this
topic? -- more specifically without
bios calls/support?
I've seen the booteas
I'm looking at booting(embedded devices) and I've been looking at lilo boot
loader code and booteasy bootloader code...
does anyone know of any documentation that anyone out there has done on this
topic? -- more specifically without
bios calls/support?
I've seen the booteas
22 matches
Mail list logo
