Well, I'm not sure what consensus is about this, but I'm gone for 3 weeks.
Soembody assign this one to me if you want me 'own' the issue when I get back.
On 8 May 2000, Christian Weisgerber wrote:
> Sheldon Hearn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Given that having things move around in the bas
On 8 May 2000, Christian Weisgerber wrote:
> Sheldon Hearn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Given that having things move around in the base system carries with it
> > varying degrees of pain, can you guys just explain why this is actually
> > necessary?
>
> Your tape drive has a quirk but no
Sheldon Hearn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Given that having things move around in the base system carries with it
> varying degrees of pain, can you guys just explain why this is actually
> necessary?
Your tape drive has a quirk but no entry yet in the kernel quirk
table, (or you simply use non
Matthew Dillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There's not much point statically linking mt if it's sitting in
> /usr/bin. On the face of it it does seem a good candidate to move
> to /bin.
As I suggested in PR #11205.
--
Christian "naddy" Weisgerber [EMAIL P
> Instead of going through pains of moving everything around, why not build
> a static mt on the rescue disk only?
Umm, that's possible also. I tend to not believe that the rescue disk is
useful since most of the machines *I* use don't have floppy drives.
-matt
To Unsubscribe: send mail t
| > > There's not much point statically linking mt if it's sitting in
| > > /usr/bin. On the face of it it does seem a good candidate to move
| > > to /bin.
| >
| > Given that having things move around in the base system carries with it
| > varying degrees of pain, can you guys just
On Mon, 8 May 2000, Sheldon Hearn wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, 05 May 2000 11:16:29 MST, Matthew Dillon wrote:
>
> > There's not much point statically linking mt if it's sitting in
> > /usr/bin. On the face of it it does seem a good candidate to move
> > to /bin.
>
> Given that having
On Fri, 05 May 2000 11:16:29 MST, Matthew Dillon wrote:
> There's not much point statically linking mt if it's sitting in
> /usr/bin. On the face of it it does seem a good candidate to move
> to /bin.
Given that having things move around in the base system carries with it
varying
> :
> :Can anyone think of a reason to *not* have mt statically linked?
> :
> :-matt
>
> There's not much point statically linking mt if it's sitting in
> /usr/bin. On the face of it it does seem a good candidate to move
> to /bin.
Well, yes, that's what would come with this as we
:
:Can anyone think of a reason to *not* have mt statically linked?
:
:-matt
There's not much point statically linking mt if it's sitting in
/usr/bin. On the face of it it does seem a good candidate to move
to /bin.
-Matt
Can anyone think of a reason to *not* have mt statically linked?
-matt
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
11 matches
Mail list logo
